پژوهش های روانشناختی در مدیریت

پژوهش های روانشناختی در مدیریت

بررسی اثربخشی اجرای نظام مدیریت عملکرد در ارتقای اشتیاق شغلی و انگیزش خودمختار کارکنان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری روانشناسی صنعتی و سازمانی، گروه روانشناسی، دانشکدۀ علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران.
2 استاد گروه روانشناسی، دانشکدۀ علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران.
چکیده
افزایش اشتیاق شغلی و انگیزش خودمختار از جملۀ پیامدهای مهم و مثبت سازمانی برای کارکنان و سازمان هستند. از این ‎رو، به‌کارگیری مداخلات سازمانی مؤثر به ویژه نظام مدیریت عملکرد در راستای توجه به این دو مؤلفه در محیط‏های کاری حائز اهمیت است. پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی اثربخشی اجرای نظام مدیریت عملکرد در ارتقای اشتیاق شغلی و انگیزش خودمختار کارکنان انجام شد. روش این پژوهش از نوع نیمه‌آزمایشی با طرح پیش‌آزمون و پس‌آزمون با گروه کنترل بود و جامعۀ آماری آن را کلیۀ کارکنان یک شرکت تولیدی- صنعتی در اصفهان تشکیل داده‌اند. شرکت‌کنندگان 48 نفر بودند که به صورت در دسترس در مطالعه شرکت کردند و به صورت تصادفی در دو گروه آزمایش و کنترل جای گرفتند. برای جمع‏آوری داده‏ها از پرسشنامه‏‏های استاندارد استفاده شد. برای گروه آزمایش مداخلۀ نظام مدیریت عملکرد در طی سه ماه اجرا شد. در نهایت، پس‌آزمون از هر دو گروه گرفته شد. برای تحلیل آماری از روش تحلیل کوواریانس با نرم‌افزارSPSS24 استفاده شد. نتایج حاصل از تحلیل کوواریانس چندمتغیری و تک‌متغیری نشان داد اجرای نظام مدیریت عملکرد موجب افزایش اشتیاق شغلی (09/4 نمره) و انگیزش خودمختار کارکنان (52/2 نمره) در گروه آزمایش شده است (05/0>p). با توجه به اینکه نظام مدیریت عملکرد کارآمد بر اشتیاق شغلی و انگیزش خودمختار کارکنان می‎تواند اثرگذار باشد، به مدیران، روانشناسان صنعتی و سازمانی و مشاوران حوزۀ منابع انسانی پیشنهاد می‏‌شود از چنین مداخلۀ سازمانی در راستای رسیدگی هرچه بهتر به امور کارکنان و دست‌یابی به پیامدهای مثبت سازمانی بهره گیرند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The Effectiveness of the Performance Management System Administration in Improving Employee Job Engagement and Autonomous Motivation

نویسندگان English

Atieh Sabaghinia 1
Seyed Esmaeil Hashemi 2
Hossein Shokrkon 2
1 Ph.D. Student of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.
2 Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.
چکیده English

Purpose: Employees are the main pillars of company success, and organizations with committed, motivated, and talented employees that provide outstanding services and creative ideas outperform competing companies without such employees. From a psychological perspective, a fundamental principle is to create conditions that encourage every employee to perform their duties with happiness and satisfaction. Performance management that encourages motivation, supports learning and development, and aligns people and processes with organizational goals can have a very positive impact on the organization's overall performance. Therefore, it is important to pay attention to the increase in positive organizational outcomes related to employees as an important factor in workplaces and the introduction of an efficient and modern performance management system compared to the past few decades, which can play a prominent role in creating and increasing positive organizational outcomes, including job enthusiasm and autonomous motivation. In the present study, an attempt has been made to conduct a distinctive and path-breaking study of managers in the field of handling employee human resources affairs. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the performance management system administration in improving employee job engagement and autonomous motivation.
Design/Methodology/Approach: This experimental study was conducted using a quasi-experimental design with a pre-test and post-test and a control group. The statistical population was all employees of a manufacturing-industrial company in Isfahan in 2025-2026. Participants were 48 individuals, of which 24 individuals were assigned to the experimental group and 24 individuals to the control group. Job Engagement Questionnaire (Schaufeli et al., 2002) and the Motivation at Work Scale (MAWS) (Gagne et al., 2010) were used to collect data. For the experimental group, the intervention of the performance management system based on the performance management cycle (Armstrong, 2022), the performance management toolkit (Armstrong, 2009), and the guidelines and instructions for objectives and key results (Doerr, 2018; Vellore, 2023) were implemented over a period of three months. In the end, a post-test was taken by both groups. Also, the analysis of covariance with SPSS version 24 software was used for statistical analysis.
Findings: The results of multivariate analysis of covariance showed that all multivariate statistics including Pillai’s effect (F= 3/922, p< 0/05), Wilks Lambda (F= 3/922, p< 0/05), Hoteling effect (F= 3/922, p< 0/05), and the largest root on (F= 3/922, p< 0/05) are significant indicating that the intervention had a significant effect on at least one of the dependent variables i.e. job engagement and autonomous motivation (p<0.05). The results of separate ANCOVAs showed that after controlling for pre-test scores, there was a significant difference between the post-test means of the experimental and control groups in the variables of job engagement and autonomous motivation (p<0.05). Therefore, the positive effect of the intervention on the job engagement and autonomous motivation of employees is confirmed.
Discussion and Conclusion: The results showed that performance management system implementation positively enhances employee job engagement and autonomous motivation. The findings indicate that key procedural elements—including goal‑setting via Objectives and Key Results (OKRs), performance and development agreements to establish clear expectations during planning, managerial application of supervisory skills and mutual understanding of roles during monitoring, and both formal and informal review meetings to address challenges and identify strengths—were effective in achieving desirable job performance. Accordingly, managers are advised to adopt these practices to realize positive organizational outcomes. A limitation of this study is the absence of a follow‑up phase. Future research is suggested to replicate this intervention in other organizational contexts and across multiple performance management cycles to examine longitudinal trends. Given the demonstrated effectiveness of performance management in enhancing job engagement and autonomous motivation, it is recommended that managers, organizational psychologists, and HR consultants utilize such interventions to improve employee outcomes and overall organizational performance.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Performance management system
Job engagement
Autonomous motivation
Employees.
منابع فارسی
1.      زارع‌زاده، محمد، حاجی علیزاده، کبری، و امیرفخرایی، آزیتا (1401). اثربخشی آموزش سرمایه‏های روانشناختی بر اشتیاق شغلی و مسئولیت‌پذیری کارکنان دارای تعارض کار-خانواده در شرکت پالایش گاز سرخون و قشم. مجلۀ دانشکدۀ پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد، 65(6)، 2515-2530. https://doi.org/10.22038/mjms.2022.66330.3911
2.      نعامی، عبدالزهرا، و شناور، فضل‌الله (1394). نقش اشتیاق شغلی، کنترل شغلی، رفتارهای نوآورانه و رهبری تحولی در پیش‎بینی دگرگون‎سازی شغلی. پژوهش‏های مدیریت عمومی، 8(27)، 145-165. https://jmr.usb.ac.ir/article_2066_0.html?lang=en 
References
1.       Aguinis, H. (2019). Performance management for dummies. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2.       Armstrong, M. (2009). Armstrong's handbook of performance management: An evidence-based guide to delivering high performance (4th ed). KoganPage.
3.       Armstrong, M. (2022). Armstrong's handbook of performance management: An evidence-based guide to performance leadership (7th ed). KoganPage.  
4.       Ashdown, L. (2018). Performance management (2nd ed). KoganPage.
5.       Awan, S.H., Habib, N., Shoaib Akhtar, C., & Naveed, S. (2020). Effectiveness of performance management system for employee performance through engagement. SAGE Open, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020969383
6.       Bahasoan, S., & Baharuddin, I. (2023). Work discipline, work motivation and employee performance. Advances in Human Resource Management Research, 1(2), 90-101. https://doi.org/10.60079/ahrmr.v1i2.92
7.       Bakker, A.B., & Leiter, M.P. (2010). Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research. Psychology Press.
8.       Bakker, A.B., Schaufeli, W.B., Leiter, M.P., & Taris, T.W. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 22(3), 187-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370802393649
9.       Bonneville-Roussy, A., & Evans, P. (2025). The support of autonomy, motivation, and music practice in university music students: A self-determination theory perspective. Psychology of Music, 53(6), 909-928.https://doi.org/10.1177/03057356241296109
10.    Brown, M., Hyatt, D., & Benson, J. (2010). Consequences of the performance appraisal experience. Personnel Review, 39(3), 375-396. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483481011030557
11.    Brudan, A., Pentek, B., Gorsk, T., & Mihailoaie, C. (2024). Navigating the complexities of performance management: A thematic analysis of organizational challenges. Timisoara Journal of Economics & Business, 17(1), 21-40. https://doi.org/10.2478/tjeb-2024-0002
12.    Bustami, E., Sunah, M.D., Afrianti, & Nurfitri. (2025). The influence of work motivation and leadership on the performance of village apparatus in Semumu village, Depati VII. International Journal of Humanity Advance, Business & Sciences (IJHABS), 3(3), 451–460. https://malaqbipublisher.com/index.php/IJHABS/article/view/829  
13.    Colquitt, J.A., LePine, J.A., Wesson, M.J., & Gellatly, I.R. (2022). Organizational behaviour: Improving performance and commitment in the workplace (5th ed). McGraw-Hill.
14.    Dangol, P. (2021). Role of performance appraisal system and its impact on employees’ motivation. Quantitative Economics and Management Studies, 2(1), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.qems119
15.    Deci, E.L., Olafsen, A.H., & Ryan, R.M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19-43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108
16.    Deshan, L., Ying, W., & Ghosh, A. (2023). The efficacy of performance management systems in augmenting employee motivation and performance in China. International Journal on Recent Trends in Business and Tourism (IJRTBT), 7(3), 94-107. https://doi.org/10.31674/ijrtbt.2021.v07i03.007
17.    Dewettinck, K. (2008). Employee performance management systems in Belgian organisations: Purpose, contextual dependence and effectiveness. European Journal of International Management, 2(2), 192-207. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2008.017761
18.    Dewi, N.K. (2025). Exploring the impact of performance management systems on employee productivity and job satisfaction. Kriez Academy: Journal of Development and Community Service, 2(8), 20-37. https://kriezacademy.com/index.php/kriezacademy/article/view/80
19.    Doerr, J. (2018). Measure what matters: How Google, Bono, and the Gates Foundation rock the world with OKRs. Portfolio/Penguin.
20.    Gagné, M., Forest, J., Gilbert, M.H., Aubé, C., Morin, E., & Malorni, A. (2010). The motivation at work scale: Validation evidence in two languages. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(4), 628-646. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355698
21.    Gruman, J.A., & Saks, A.M. (2011). Performance management and employee engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 21(2), 123-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.09.004
22.    Hagger, M.S., Hardcastle, S.J., Chater, A., Mallett, C., Pal, S., & Chatzisarantis, N.L.D. (2014). Autonomous and controlled motivational regulations for multiple health-related behaviors: Between-and within-participants analyses. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine: An Open Access Journal, 2(1), 565-601. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2014.912945
23.    Hakanen, J.J., & Kaltiainen, J. (2026). Work engagement: Feeling happy, motivated, and resilient at work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 13(1), 23-48. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-020924-064233
24.    Hanum, N.R., Hubeis, M., & Hidayatulloh, F.S. (2023). Factors of performance management system and work motivation on employee engagement through employee performance as a mediation variable. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research Studies, 3(10), 2003-2010. https://doi.org/10.55677/ijssers/V03I10Y2023-05
25.    Hernandi, F.U., & Prabowo, R.J. (2024). The effect of discipline development and work motivation on the performance: Empirical study from civil servants at the spatial planning office Bekasi City, Indonesia. Golden Ratio of Human Resource Management, 4(2), 97-110. https://doi.org/10.52970/grhrm.v4i2.461
26.    Kakkar, S., Dash, S., Vohra, N., & Saha, S. (2020). Engaging employees through effective performance management: An empirical examination. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(5), 1843-1860. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2019-0440
27.    Kavitha, S.R. (2025). The impact of human resource practices on organizational performance: The mediating role of work engagement. International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Scope, 6(1), 213-225.  https://doi.org/10.47857/irjms.2025.v06i01.02661
28.    Levy, P.E. (2020). Industrial/organizational psychology: Understanding the workplace (6th ed). Worth Publishers.
29.    Lifang, Z., & Ali, D.A. (2024). The impact of performance management on employee motivation and engagement. Accounting and Corporate Management, 6(2), 17-23. https://doi.org/10.23977/acccm.2024.060203
30.    Maake, G., Harmse, C.P., & Schultz, C.M. (2021). Performance management as a mediator for work engagement and employment relationships in the public sector in South Africa. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(0),1-12. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v19i0.1507
31.    Naami, A., & Shenavar, F. (2015). The role of work engagement, job control, innovative behavior, and transformational leadership in prediction of job crafting. Public Management Researches, 8(27), 145-165. https://jmr.usb.ac.ir/article_2066_0.html?lang=en (In Persian) 
32.    Nega, N. (2022). Effect of performance management system on employees’ motivation: The case of Ethiopian Airlines in facility maintenance employees [Doctoral dissertation, ST. MARY’S UNIVERSITY].
33.    Noronha, S.F., Aquinas, P.G., & Manezes, A.D. (2018). Is job performance better attributable to performance management system through work engagement?. Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, 9(1), 01-04. http://dx.doi.org/10.18843/ijcms/v9i1/01
34.    Othman, A., Akanmu, M.D., & Bawa, A. (2026). Impact of performance appraisal practices on employee engagement in the civil service. Institutions and Economies, 18(1), 55-83. https://doi.org/10.22452/IJIE.vol18no1.3
35.    Parastar, R. (2025). Job engagement and employee voice among nurses with the mediating role of leadership style. Management Issues in Healthcare System, 11, 17-36.https://doi.org/10.32038/mihs.2025.11.02
36.    Ricci, L.M. (2016). The impact of performance management system characteristics on perceived effectiveness of the system and engagement [Master's Theses, San José State University]. https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.qh7m-s97u
37.    Robbins, S.P., & Judge, T.A. (2024). Organizational behavior (19th ed). Prentice Hall.
38.    Rothmann, S., & Cooper. C.L. (2022). Work and organizational Psychology (3rd ed). Routledge.
39.    Saleh, M.O., Eshah, N.F., & Rayan, A.H. (2022). Empowerment predicting nurses’ work motivation and occupational mental health. SAGE Open Nursing, 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608221076811
40.    Schaufeli, W.B., Bakker, A.B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
41.    Schaufeli, W.B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A.B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two-sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
42.    Silva, M., & Rodrigues, R.I. (2025). Training and job satisfaction in Portugal’s public sector: A sequential mediation model based on competency acquisition, performance appraisal, and career progression. Administrative Sciences, 15(5), 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15050189
43.    Simone, R.P., Teja, A.H., Ismail, G.D., Sofianti, N.A., & Hamdani, D. (2026). Analysis of the impact of training, motivation, and performance on employee productivity of Pt Food Beverage Indonesia (Chatime Bandung). Jurnal Locus Penelitian dan Pengabdian, 5(2), 892-900. https://doi.org/10.58344/locus.v5i2.5460
44.    Singh, P., & Twalo, T. (2015). Effects of poorly implemented performance management systems on the job behavior and performance of employees. The International Business & Economics Research Journal (Online), 14(1), 79-94. https://doi.org/10.19030/iber.v14i1.9034
45.    Siregar, J., Widodo, W., Permana, R., Sriyono, H., & Saputro, A. (2026). Evoking teachers’ innovative work behavior: Perspective of digital leadership, creativity, and proactive personality through work engagement. European Journal of Educational Research, 15(1), 323-339. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.15.1.323
46.    Subekti, A. (2021). The influence of performance appraisal system towards job satisfaction, motivation, as well as employee performance. International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), 5(2), 104-114. https://doi.org/10.29040/ijebar.v5i2.2484
47.    Tiwari, R. (2020). Relationship between performance appraisal and employee performance: A study. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), 22(12), 57-61. https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-2212045761
48.    Vellore, V. (2023). OKRs for all: Making objectives and key results work for your entire organization. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
49.    Yalçın, G.C., Kara, K., Edinsel, S., Kaygısız, E.G., Simic, V., & Pamucar, D. (2025). Authentication system selection for performance appraisal in human resource management using an intuitionistic fuzzy CIMAS-ARLON model. Applied Soft Computing, 171, 112786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2025.112786
50.    Yi, Y. (2022). Application of an improved clustering algorithm of neural networks in performance appraisal systems. Journal of Cases on Information Technology (JCIT), 24(5), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.4018/JCIT.304385
51.    Zarezadeh, M., Hajalizadeh, K., & Amirfakhraei, A. (2023). Efficacy of psychological capitals training on the job engagement and responsibility of the staff with work-family conflict in Sarkhun and Qeshm Gas Refining Company. Medical Journal of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, 65(6), 2515-2530.  https://doi.org/10.22038/mjms.2022.66330.3911 (In Persian)