پژوهش های روانشناختی در مدیریت

پژوهش های روانشناختی در مدیریت

الگوی تأثیر رهبری تحول‌آفرین بر رفتارهای کاری نوآورانه: تبیین نقش میانجی سرمایۀ روان‌شناختی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده
استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
رفتارهای کاری نوآورانه به عنوان یکی از عوامل کلیدی ارتقای اثربخشی و مزیت رقابتی سازمان‌ها، نقشی مهم در موفقیت سازمان‌ها ایفا می‌کند. از این رو، پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی تأثیر رهبری تحول‌آفرین بر توسعۀ رفتارهای کاری نوآورانه با نقش واسطه‌ای سرمایۀ روان‌شناختی در کارکنان آموزش‌وپرورش استان خراسان شمالی انجام شد. پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف، کاربردی و از نظر روش، توصیفی-همبستگی مبتنی بر مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری بود. جامعۀ آماری پژوهش شامل تمامی کارکنان آموزش‌وپرورش استان خراسان شمالی به تعداد 553 نفر بود که 230 نفر به شیوۀ نمونه‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند. داده‌های پژوهش با استفاده از پرسشنامه‌های استاندارد گردآوری و با استفاده از ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری در نرم‌افزارهای SPSS نسخۀ 24 و AMOS نسخۀ 24 تحلیل شدند. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد رهبری تحول‌آفرین تأثیر معناداری بر رفتارهای کاری نوآورانۀ کارکنان دارد. همچنین، بین رهبری تحول‌آفرین و سرمایۀ روان‌شناختی و نیز بین سرمایۀ روان‌شناختی و رفتارهای کاری نوآورانه رابطه‌ای مثبت و معنادار مشاهده شد. علاوه بر این، نقش واسطه‌ای سرمایۀ روان‌شناختی در رابطۀ بین رهبری تحول‌آفرین و رفتارهای کاری نوآورانه تأیید شد. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان داد رهبری تحول‌آفرین از طریق تقویت ظرفیت‌های روان‌شناختی مثبت کارکنان، زمینۀ توسعۀ رفتارهای کاری نوآورانه را فراهم می‌کند. رهبران تحول‌آفرین با ایجاد انگیزش، حمایت روانی، تقویت خودکارآمدی و ترغیب کارکنان به تفکر خلاق، بستری مناسب برای بروز رفتارهای نوآورانه ایجاد می‌کنند. بنابراین، توجه هم‌زمان به سبک رهبری تحول‌آفرین و ارتقای سرمایۀ روان‌شناختی کارکنان می‌تواند نقشی مؤثر در افزایش نوآوری، پویایی و اثربخشی سازمان‌های آموزشی داشته باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The Model of the Impact of Transformational Leadership on Innovative Work Behaviors: Explaining the Mediating Role of Psychological Capital

نویسنده English

Sara AbediKooshki
Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

Purpose: Innovative work behavior has become an important factor in organizational effectiveness, adaptability, and development, particularly in dynamic and changing environments. In educational organizations, employees' innovative behaviors can improve organizational processes, enhance educational service quality, and increase organizational dynamism. Among the organizational factors influencing innovative work behavior, leadership plays a particularly important role. Through inspirational motivation, idealized influence, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration, transformational leadership can encourage employees to move beyond routine practices and contribute to organizational improvement. At the same time, psychological capital—comprising self-efficacy, hope, resilience, and optimism—may constitute an important mechanism through which leadership practices are translated into innovative behaviors. Accordingly, this study aimed to investigate the effect of transformational leadership on innovative work behavior among employees of the North Khorasan Province Department of Education and to examine the mediating role of psychological capital in this relationship.
Design/Methodology/Approach: The study was applied in terms of purpose and employed a descriptive-correlational design based on structural equation modeling. The statistical population consisted of all 553 employees of the North Khorasan Province Department of Education during the 2024–2025 academic year. A total of 300 questionnaires were distributed, and after excluding incomplete questionnaires, 230 completed questionnaires were included in the final analysis using convenience sampling. Data were collected using standardized questionnaires: innovative work behavior was measured using Janssen's (2000) nine-item questionnaire, transformational leadership using the Bass and Avolio (2000) questionnaire, and psychological capital using the Luthans, Youssef, and Avolio (2007) 24-item questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.84, 0.88, and 0.91, respectively. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 24 and AMOS version 24; confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to assess the measurement model, structural equation modeling was employed to examine the hypothesized relationships, and the mediating effect of psychological capital was tested using bootstrapping with 5,000 resamples.
Findings: The results showed that transformational leadership had a positive and statistically significant direct effect on innovative work behavior (β = 0.284, P = 0.027). Transformational leadership also had a strong positive and statistically significant effect on psychological capital (β = 0.770, P < 0.001), explaining 59.4% of its variance. Furthermore, psychological capital positively and significantly affected innovative work behavior (β = 0.325, P = 0.014). Transformational leadership and psychological capital jointly explained 32.9% of the variance in innovative work behavior. The structural model demonstrated an acceptable overall fit, with χ²/df = 2.891, CFI = 0.941, TLI = 0.917, IFI = 0.942, GFI = 0.908, NFI = 0.914, and RMSEA = 0.091. The bootstrap results confirmed a significant indirect effect of transformational leadership on innovative work behavior through psychological capital. The standardized indirect effect was β = 0.251 (P = 0.006), with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 0.111 to 0.432. Because the confidence interval did not include zero, the indirect effect was statistically significant. Moreover, the direct effect of transformational leadership remained significant after psychological capital was entered into the model. Therefore, psychological capital partially mediated the relationship between transformational leadership and innovative work behavior.
Conclusion: The findings indicate that transformational leadership can promote innovative work behavior among employees of educational organizations through both direct and indirect pathways. The mediating role of psychological capital suggests that part of this influence is realized by strengthening employees' positive psychological resources. Transformational leaders can facilitate innovation by creating a supportive climate, communicating an inspiring vision, providing individualized support, encouraging intellectual engagement, and strengthening employees' confidence. These practices can enhance psychological capital and, consequently, employees' readiness to generate, promote, and implement new ideas. The partial mediation also indicates that transformational leadership affects innovative work behavior through mechanisms beyond psychological capital, suggesting the potential contribution of other individual, interpersonal, and organizational factors. From a practical perspective, educational organizations seeking to strengthen innovation should focus on developing transformational leadership competencies while also strengthening employees' psychological capital. Interventions that strengthen self-efficacy, hope, resilience, and optimism may increase employees' psychological readiness to engage in innovative activities. Overall, the findings emphasize the importance of considering leadership practices and positive psychological resources together when explaining and promoting innovative work behavior, and the proposed model offers a useful framework and practical implications for enhancing organizational innovation in the education sector.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Transformational leadership
Developing innovative work behaviors
Psychological capital
منابع فارسی
1.      تقوایی، مریم (1400). رفتار مدیریتی نوآورانه و رهبری تحول‌آفرین با نقش میانجی تاب‌آوری سازمانی. پژوهشنامۀ تربیتی، 16(4)، 15–38. https://doi.org/10.30495/educ.2021.685033
2.      سعادت، نیلوفر، و شاه‌طلبی حسین‌آبادی، بدری (1399). رابطۀ رهبری تحول‌آفرین و عملکرد نوآورانه با نقش میانجی تاب‌آوری کارکنان دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان). پژوهش‌های مدیریت آموزشی، 12(1)، 197–206. https://sanad.iau.ir/fa/Article/1112952
3.      فرخی، مجتبی، و امیری، زینب (1402). نقش میانجی نیازهای بنیادین روان‌شناختی در تأثیر رهبری تحول‌آفرین بر رفتار کاری نوآورانه. رهبری آموزشی کاربردی، 4(4)، 136–149.  https://doi.org/10.22098/ael.2024.13739.1347
4.      قاسمی، وحید (۱۳۸۹). مدل‌سازی معادلۀ ساختاری در پژوهش‌های اجتماعی با کاربرد AMOS Graphics. تهران: جامعه‌شناسان.
5.       کاظمیان مقدم، کبری، و طاهری رشیدی، همایون (1399). رابطۀ سرمایۀ روان‌شناختی و معنویت در کار با بهزیستی روان‌شناختی پرستاران. مجلۀ مبانی سلامت روان، 22(2)، 83–89.
https://doi.org/10.22038/jfmh.2020.16146
6.      مهرآمیز، سارا (1396). رابطۀ تفکر سیستمی و باورهای غیرمنطقی با رفتارهای نوآورانه معلمان مقطع ابتدایی شهر بیرجند [پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد]. دانشگاه بیرجند.
7.      میرچولی، زهرا (1402). رابطۀ رهبری تحول‌آفرین و رفتارفرا نقش با میانجی‌گری تاب‌آوری سازمانی در مدیران زن مدارس ابتدایی شهر سبزوار [پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد]. دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد سبزوار.
References
1.       Abbas, M., & Raja, U. (2015). Impact of psychological capital on innovative performance and job stress. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 32(2), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1314  
2.       Afsar, B., & Umrani, W.A. (2020). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior: The role of motivation to learn, task complexity and innovation climate. European Journal of Innovation Management, 23(3), 402–428. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2018-0257
3.       Arnold, K.A., & Loughlin, C. (2013). Integrating transformational and participative versus directive leadership theories: Examining intellectual stimulation in male and female leaders across three contexts. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 34(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731311289974
4.       Avey, J.B., Reichard, R.J., Luthans, F., & Mhatre, K.H. (2011). Meta-analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(2), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20070
5.       Bakker, A.B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
6.       Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
7.       Bass, B.M., & Avolio, B.J. (2000). MLQ, Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire sampler set: Technical report, leader form, rater form, and scoring key for MLQ form 5X-Short (2nd ed.). Mind Garden.
8.       Blasco-Giner, C., Battistelli, A., Meneghel, I., & Salanova, M. (2023). Psychological capital, autonomous motivation and innovative behavior: A study aimed at employees in social networks. Psychological Reports, 128(4), 2620–2648. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941231183614   
9.       Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. John Wiley & Sons
10.    Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Routledge.
11.    Chen, W., Zhu, X., Sun, S., Liao, S., & Guo, Z. (2021). The impact of employees’ psychological capital on innovative work behavior: The chain mediating effect of knowledge donating and knowledge collecting. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 761399. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.761399    
12.    Farrukh, M., Meng, F., Raza, A., & Wu, Y. (2022). Innovative work behaviour: The what, where, who, how and when. Personnel Review, 52(1), 74–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2020-0854
13.    Farrokhi, M., & Amiri, Z. (2023). The mediating role of basic psychological needs in the effect of transformational leadership on innovative work behavior. Applied Educational Leadership, 4(4), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.22098/ael.2024.13739.1347  (In Persian)
14.    Ghasemi, V. (2010). Model-sazi-ye mo'adele-ye sakhtari dar pazhoohesh-haye ejtemaei ba karbord-e AMOS Graphics [Structural equation modeling in social research using AMOS Graphics]. Jame'e-Shenasan. (In Persian)
15.    Gom, D., Lew, T.Y., Jiony, M.M., Tanakinjal, G.H., & Sondoh, S. (2021). The role of transformational leadership and psychological capital in the hotel industry: A sustainable approach to reducing turnover intention. Sustainability, 13(19), 10799. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910799  
16.    Hao, P., He, W., & Long, L.-R. (2018). Why and when empowering leadership has different effects on employee work performance: The pivotal roles of passion for work and role breadth self-efficacy. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 25(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051817707517
17.    Hobfoll, S.E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
18.    Hobfoll, S.E., Halbesleben, J.R.B., Neveu, J.P., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640
19.    Hughes, M., Rigtering, J.P.C., Covin, J.G., Bouncken, R.B., & Kraus, S. (2018). Innovative behaviour, trust and perceived workplace performance. British Journal of Management, 29(4), 750–768. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12305  
20.    Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort–reward fairness and innovative work behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038  
21.    Kazemian-Moghaddam, K., & Taheri-Rashidi, H. (2020). The relationship between psychological capital and spirituality at work with nurses’ psychological well-being. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health, 22(2), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.22038/jfmh.2020.16146 (In Persian)
22.    Kline, R.B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
23.    Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308  
24.    Liu, C.H.S., & Huang, Y.C. (2020). The influence of transformational leadership on subordinate creative behaviour development process. Tourism Management Perspectives, 36, 100742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100742  
25.    Luthans, F., Youssef, C.M., & Avolio, B.J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195187526.001.0001
26.    Luthans, F., & Youssef-Morgan, C.M. (2017). Psychological capital: An evidence-based positive approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 339–366. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113324
27.    Mehrangiz, S. (2017). The relationship between systems thinking and irrational beliefs with innovative behaviors [Master’s thesis]. University of Birjand. (In Persian)
28.    Messmann, G., Evers, A.T., & Kreijns, K. (2022). Basic psychological needs satisfaction in the relationship between transformational leadership and innovative work behavior. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 33(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21451
29.    Mirchouli, Z. (2023). The relationship between transformational leadership and role behavior with the mediating role of organizational resilience among female elementary school principals [Master’s thesis]. Islamic Azad University, Sabzevar Branch. (In Persian)
30.    Malik, P. (2024). Exploring the role of individual-focused transformational leadership in facilitating taking charge: Mediating mechanism of psychological capital and thriving at work. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 73(2), 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-02-2022-0077
31.    Newman, A., Ucbasaran, D., Zhu, F., & Hirst, G. (2014). Psychological capital: A review and synthesis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(S1), S120–S138. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1916
32.    Osborn, R.N., & Marion, R. (2009). Contextual leadership, transformational leadership and the performance of international innovation-seeking alliances. Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.010
33.    Peng, J.-C., & Chen, S.-W. (2022). Learning climate and innovative creative performance: Exploring the multi-level mediating mechanism of team psychological capital and work engagement. Current Psychology, 42(15), 13114–13132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02617-3
34.    Saadat, N., & Shahtalabi-Hosseinabadi, H. (2020). The relationship between transformational leadership and innovative performance with the mediating role of employee resilience. Educational Management Research, 12(1), 197–206. https://sanad.iau.ir/fa/Article/1112952 (In Persian)
35.    Scott, S.G., & Bruce, R.A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607. https://doi.org/10.5465/256701
36.    Taghvaei, M. (2021). The relationship between the innovative behavior of managers and transformational leadership with the mediating role of organizational resilience (Case study: Islamic Azad University, Sari Branch). Educational Research Journal, 16(4), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.30495/educ.2021.685033 (In Persian)
37.    Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137–1148. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069429