پژوهش های روانشناختی در مدیریت

پژوهش های روانشناختی در مدیریت

تدوین و آزمون الگویی از اثر سبک های دلبستگی سازمانی ایمن، اضطرابی و اجتنابی بر بهزیستی روانشناختی شغلی: میانجی گری نیازهای روانشناختی بنیادین سازمانی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری روانشناسی صنعتی و سازمانی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران.
2 استاد گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران.
چکیده
این پژوهش با هدف تدوین و آزمون الگویی از اثر سبک های دلبستگی سازمانی ایمن، اضطرابی و اجتنابی بر بهزیستی روان‌شناختی در محیط کار با میانجی‌گری کامروایی نیازهای روان‌شناختی بنیادین سازمانی انجام شد. طرح پژوهش حاضر از نوع کاربردی و روش آن توصیفی - همبستگی بود. نمونۀ پژوهش شامل 200 نفر از کارکنان شرکت آبفای اهواز بود که با روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی ساده انتخاب شدند. به منظور گردآوری داده‌ها، از پرسشنامه‌های دلبستگی سازمانی (Scrima et al., 2021)، کامروایی نیازهای روان‌شناختی بنیادین سازمانی (Van den Broeck et al., 2010)، بهزیستی روان‌شناختی در محیط کار (Dagenais-Desmarais & Savoie, 2011) استفاده شد. برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها از نرم‌افزارSpss-24 و روش الگویابی معادلات ساختاری با استفاده از نرم‌افزار Amos-24 و روش بوت‌استراپ استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد الگوی طراحی شده از برازش مناسب برخوردار است. همچنین، یافته‌ها نشان داد مسیرهای دلبستگی سازمانی ایمن، اضطرابی و اجتنابی به کامروایی نیازهای روان‌شناختی بنیادین سازمانی بر بهزیستی شغلی معنادار بودند. همچنین، کامروایی نیازهای روان‌شناختی بنیادین سازمانی اثرات دلبستگی سازمانی ایمن، اضطرابی و اجتنابی بر بهزیستی روان‌شناختی شغلی را میانجی‌گری کرد. بنابراین، می‌توان نتیجه گرفت سبک‌های دلبستگی سازمانی ایمن، اضطرابی و اجتنابی به طور مستقیم و نیز از طریق کامروایی نیازهای روان‌شناختی بنیادین سازمانی بر بهزیستی شغلی اثرگذار بودند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Designing and testing a model of effects of secure, anxious and avoidant organizational attachment styles on job psychological well-being: mediating organizational basic psychological needs satisfaction

نویسندگان English

Moloud Hendiani 1
َAbdulZahra Naami 2
1 Ph.D. student of Organizational Industrial Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.
2 Professor, Department of Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.
چکیده English

Purpose: The psychological health of employees is one of the important issues in organizations. One of the dimensions of psychological health is job psychological well-being. Job psychological well-being means paying attention to the physical, mental, and social dimensions of employees and creating a positive and happy organizational environment, satisfied and committed employees, satisfied customers, good relations between employees and employers, and low stress and anxiety in the workplace. Job well-being has five areas: interpersonal fit at work, growth at work, sense of competence at work, perceived appreciation at work, and desire to participate. Considering the important consequences of organizational psychological well-being, examining its antecedents is of particular importance because, with the help of these antecedents, job psychological well-being can be predicted and increased. In the present study, a model of antecedents and mediators was designed to predict job psychological well-being, which is based on the theory of organizational attachment and self-determination. Accordingly, the present study seeks to determine whether different organizational attachment styles can lead to the fulfillment or non-fulfillment of employees' fundamental organizational psychological needs and, as a result, affect employees' job psychological well-being.
Design/Methodology/Approach: The current research was applied and its method was descriptive. The statistical population of the research was the Water & Wastewater company in Ahvaz City. In this study, the required sample size was determined as 230 people using the Kreschi-Cochran formula. The final sample comprised 200 participants selected through a simple random sampling method. The tools used were the scale of organizational attachment Styles (Scrima et al., 2021), psychological well-being in workplace scale (Dagenais-Desmarais & Savoie, 2011), and work-related basic needs (Van den Broeck et al., 2010). Data analysis was done using the statistical method of structural equation modeling, Amos -24 software, and the bootstrap method.
Findings: The results obtained from the research showed that the path coefficients of secure, anxious, and avoidant organizational attachment to job psychological well-being were 0.35, -0.29, and -0.27, respectively, and were significant at the p<0.001 level. Also, the path coefficients of secure, anxious, and avoidant organizational attachment styles with the fulfillment of organizational basic psychological needs were 0.19, -0.18, and -0.20, respectively, and all of them were significant at the p<0.001 level. The path coefficient of the fulfillment of organizational basic psychological needs with job psychological well-being is 0.40, which is significant at the p<0.001 level. The coefficients of indirect effect of secure, anxious, and avoidant organizational attachment on job psychological well-being through the fulfillment of organizational basic psychological needs were 0.19, -0/17, and -0/15 respectively, all three of which were significant at the 0.001 level.
Discussion and Conclusion: The results of the study showed that organizational attachment styles directly affected job psychological well-being through fundamental organizational psychological needs. The direct effect of organizational attachment styles on psychological well-being at work was such that employees who had a secure organizational attachment style had a positive attitude toward the organization and perceived all organizational behaviors and decisions with a positive intention. This factor could be considered a kind of organizational support that could increase psychological well-being at work. The fulfillment of basic psychological needs resulting from a secure organizational attachment style directly helped employees to control stressful environmental conditions, increased self-efficacy to increase adaptation, and helped employees increase psychological well-being in the workplace by attracting more social support.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Secure
anxious and avoidant organizational attachment
Job well-being
Organizational basic psychological needs satisfaction
  1. Bowie, D., & Buttle, F. (2013). Hospitality Marketing. Routledge.
  2. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
  3. Calvo, V., D’Aquila, C., Rocco, D., & Carraro, E. (2022). Attachment and well-being: Mediatory roles of mindfulness, psychological inflexibility, and resilience. Current Psychology, 41(5). org/10.1007/s12144-020-00820-2
  4. Ceri, V., & Cicek, I. (2020). Psychological Well-Being, Depression and Stress During COVID-19 Pandemic in Turkey: A Comparative Study of Healthcare Professionals and Non-Healthcare Professionals. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 26(1), 1–13. org/10.1080/13548506.2020.1859566
  5. Chen, W., Zhang, D., Pan, Y., Hu, T., Liu, G., & Luo, S. (2017). Perceived social support and self-esteem as mediators of the relationship between parental attachment and life satisfaction among Chinese adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 98–102. org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.12.009
  6. Cohen, A., & Shamai, O. (2010). The relationship between individual values, psychological well‐being, and organizational commitment among Israeli police officers. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 33(1), 30–51. org/10.1108/13639511011020584
  7. Dagenais-Desmarais, V., & Savoie, A. (2011). What is Psychological Well-Being, Really? A Grassroots Approach from the Organizational Sciences. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(4), 659–684. org/10.1007/s10902-011-9285-3
  8. Debrot, A., Stellar, J.E., MacDonald, G., Keltner, D., & Impett, E.A. (2020). Is Touch in Romantic Relationships Universally Beneficial for Psychological Well-Being? The Role of Attachment Avoidance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(10), 1495–1509. org/10.1177/0146167220977709
  9. Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2012). Self-Determination Theory. In P.A.M. Van Lange, A.W. Kruglanski, & E.T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 416-437). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. org/10.4135/9781446249215.n21
  10. Deci, E.L., Olafsen, A.H., & Ryan, R.M. (2017). Self-Determination Theory in Work Organizations: The State of a Science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 19–43. Available from: https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108
  11. Felton, L., & Jowett, S. (2013). Attachment and well-being: The mediating effects of psychological needs satisfaction within the coach–athlete and parent–athlete relational contexts. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(1), 57–65. org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.07.006
  12. Gilbert, M.-H., Dagenais-Desmarais, V., & St-Hilaire, F. (2017). Transformational leadership and autonomy support management behaviors. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(2), 320–332. org/10.1108/lodj-08-2015-0173
  13. Hazan, C., & Shaver, P.R. (1990). Love and work: An attachment-theoretical perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(2), 270–280.  org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.2.270
  14. Homan, K.J. (2016). Secure attachment and eudaimonic well-being in late adulthood: The mediating role of self-compassion. Aging & Mental Health, 22(3), 363–370. org/10.1080/13607863.2016.1254597
  15. Jena, L.K., Pradhan, S., & Panigrahy, N.P. (2018). Pursuit of organisational trust: Role of employee engagement, psychological well-being and transformational leadership. Asia Pacific Management Review, 23(3), 227–234.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2017.11.001
  16. Jiang, L., Bohle, S.L., & Roche, M. (2018). Contingent Reward Transactional Leaders as “Good Parents”: Examining the Mediation Role of Attachment Insecurity and the Moderation Role of Meaningful Work. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(4). org/10.1007/s10869-018-9553-x
  17. Joeng, J.R., Turner, S.L., Kim, E.Y., Choi, S.A., Lee, Y.J., & Kim, J.K. (2017). Insecure attachment and emotional distress: Fear of self-compassion and self-compassion as mediators. Personality and Individual Differences, 112, 6–11. org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.048
  18. Johnson, S. M. (2019). Attachment theory in practice: Emotionally Focused Therapy (EFT) with individuals, couples, and families. The Guilford Press.
  19. Johnstone, M., & Feeney, J.A. (2015). Individual differences in responses to workplace stress: the contribution of attachment theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45(7), 412–424. org/10.1111/jasp.12308
  20. Jungert, T., Van den Broeck, A., Schreurs, B., & Osterman, U. (2018). How colleagues can support each other's needs and motivation: An intervention on employee work motivation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 67(1), 3–29. org/10.1111/apps.12110
  21. Kafetsios, K., & Sideridis, G.D. (2006). Attachment, Social Support and Well-being in Young and Older Adults. Journal of Health Psychology, 11(6), 863–875. doi.org/10.1177/1359105306069084
  22. Karreman, A., & Vingerhoets, A.J.J.M. (2012). Attachment and well-being: The mediating role of emotion regulation and resilience. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(7), 821–826. doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.06.014
  23. Kaltiainen, J., & Hakanen, J. (2020). Fostering task and adaptive performance through employee well-being: the role of servant leadership. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 25(1), 28-43. org/10.1177/2340944420981599
  24. Kormas, C., Karamali, G., & Anagnostopoulos, F. (2014). Attachment Anxiety, Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction and Depressive Symptoms in University Students: A Mediation Analysis Approach. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 6(2), 1-10. doi.org/10.5539/ijps.v6n2p1
  25. Kundi, Y.M., Aboramadan, M., Elhamalawi, E.M.I., & Shahid, S. (2021). Employee Psychological Well-being and Job Performance: Exploring Mediating and Moderating Mechanisms. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 29(3), 736–754. Emerald. doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-05-2020-2204
  26. La Guardia, J.G., Ryan, R.M., Couchman, C.E., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(3), 367–384. org/10.1037//0022-3514.79.3.367
  27. Lataster, J., Reijnders, J., Janssens, M., Simons, M., Peeters, S., & Jacobs, N. (2022). Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Well-Being Across Age: A Cross-Sectional General Population Study among 1709 Dutch Speaking Adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 23(5), 2259-2290. org/10.1007/s10902-021-00482-2
  28. Leak, G.K., & Cooney, R.R. (2001). Self-determination, attachment styles, and wellbeing in adult romantic relationships. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 25, 55-62. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:149630541
  29. López, A., Sanderman, R., Smink, A., Zhang, Y., van Sonderen, E., Ranchor, A., & Schroevers, M.J. (2015). A Reconsideration of the Self-Compassion Scale’s Total Score: Self-Compassion versus Self-Criticism. PLOS ONE, 10(7). doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132940
  30. Little, L.M., Nelson, D.L., Wallace, J.C., & Johnson, P.D. (2010). Integrating attachment style, vigor at work, and extra-role performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(3), 464–484. org/10.1002/job.709
  31. Littman-Ovadia, H., Oren, L., & Lavy, S. (2013). Attachment and Autonomy in the Workplace. Journal of Career Assessment, 21(4), 502–518. org/10.1177/1069072712475282
  32. Nourialeagha, B., Ajilchi, B., & Kisely, S. (2020). The mediating role of gratitude in the relationship between attachment styles and psychological well-being. Australasian Psychiatry, 28(4), 426–430. doi.org/10.1177/1039856220930672
  33. Nur Kartal, C. (2023). Investigating the Different Roles of Avoidant and Anxious Attachment on Psychological Well-Being Mediated by Interpersonal Emotion Regulation [Master’s Thesis].
  34. Magai, C. (2008). Attachment in middle and later life. In J. Cassidy & P.R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications(2nd ed., pp. 532–551). The Guilford Press.
  35. Marrero-Quevedo, R.J., Blanco-Hernández, P.J., & Hernández-Cabrera, J.A. (2018). Adult Attachment and Psychological Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Personality. Journal of Adult Development, 26(1), 41–56. doi.org/10.1007/s10804-018-9297-x
  36. Molero, F., Shaver, P.R., Fernández, I., & Recio, P. (2017). Attachment insecurities, life satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction from a dyadic perspective: The role of positive and negative affect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(3), 337–347. org/10.1002/ejsp.2276
  37. Moradi Siahafshadi, M., Amiri, Sh., Molavi, H., & Ghasemi, N. (2018). The Relationship between Attachment and Subjective Well-being: The Mediating Role of Emotion Regulation Skill. International Journal of Psychology, 12(1), 118–135. org/10.24200/ijpb.2018.58150
  38. Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P.R. (2013). The role of attachment security in adolescent and adult close relationships. In J.A. Simpson & L. Campbell (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships(pp. 66–89). Oxford University Press.
  39. Parada‐Fernández, P., Herrero‐Fernández, D., Oliva‐Macías, M., & Rohwer, H. (2021). Analysis of the mediating effect of mentalization on the relationship between attachment styles and emotion dysregulation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 62(3), 312–320. org/10.1111/sjop.12717.
  40. Parfyonova, N.M., Meyer, J.P., Espinoza, J.A., Anderson, B.K., Cameron, K.A., Daljeet, K.N., & Vaters, C. (2019). Managerial support for employees’ psychological needs: A multidimensional approach. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 51(2), 122–134. org/10.1037/cbs0000126
  41. Pšeničny, A., & Perat, M. (2020). Fear of Relationship Loss: Attachment Style as a Vulnerability Factor in Job Burnout. Slovenian Journal of Public Health, 59(3), 146–154. org/10.2478/sjph-2020-0019
  42. Ryan, R., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68
  43. Reizer, A. (2019). Bringing Self-Kindness into the Workplace: Exploring the Mediating Role of Self-Compassion in the Associations Between Attachment and Organizational Outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01148
  44. River, L.M., Borelli, J.L., & Nelson-Coffey, S.K. (2019). Tolerance of Infant Distress Among Working Parents: Examining the Roles of Attachment Anxiety and Work–Family Conflict. Parenting, 19(1-2), 137–159. org/10.1080/15295192.2019.1556023
  45. Romani, M., & Ashkar, K. (2014). Burnout among physicians. Libyan Journal of Medicine, 9(1). org/10.3402/ljm.v9.23556.
  46. Schachner, D.A., Shaver, P.R., & Mikulincer, M. (2005). Patterns of Nonverbal Behavior and Sensivity in the Context of Attachment Relations. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29(3), 141–169. org/10.1007/s10919-005-4847-x
  47. Schlechter, P., Hellmann, J.H., & Morina, N. (2022). Self-discrepancy, Depression, Anxiety, and Psychological Well-Being: The Role of Affective Style and Self-efficacy. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 46(6), 1075–1086. org/10.1007/s10608-022-10314-z
  48. Schusterschitz, C., Danay, E., & Geser, W. (2018). Emotional reactions to daily workload: The moderating role of attachment orientations. Work & Stress, 32(3), 262–280. org/10.1080/02678373.2018.1437094
  49. Scrima, F., Mura, A.L., Nonnis, M., & Fornara, F. (2021). The relation between workplace attachment style, design satisfaction, privacy and exhaustion in office employees: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 78. doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101693.
  50. Tesi, A., Aiello, A., & Giannetti, E. (2018). The work-related well-being of social workers: Framing job demands, psychological well-being, and work engagement. Journal of Social Work, 19(1), 121–141. doi.org/10.1177/1468017318757397
  51. Turton, H., Berry, K., Danquah, A., Green, J., & Pratt, D. (2022). An investigation of whether emotion regulation mediates the relationship between attachment insecurity and suicidal ideation and behaviour. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 29(5),1587-1598. org/10.1002/cpp.2735
  52. Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Witte, H., Soenens, B., & Lens, W. (2010). Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the Work-related Basic Need Satisfaction scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 981–1002. org/10.1348/096317909x481382
  53. Van den Broeck, A., Ferris, D.L., Chang, C.H., & Rosen, C.C. (2016). A Review of Self-Determination Theory’s Basic Psychological Needs at Work. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1195–229. org/10.1177/0149206316632058
  54. Vîrgă, D., Schaufeli, W.B., Taris, T.W., van Beek, I., & Sulea, C. (2019). Attachment Styles and Employee Performance: The Mediating Role of Burnout. The Journal of Psychology, 153(4), 383–401. org/10.1080/00223980.2018.1542375
  55. Vowels, L.M., Carnelley, K.B., & Stanton, S.C.E. (2022). Attachment anxiety predicts worse mental health outcomes during COVID-19: Evidence from two studies. Personality and Individual Differences, 185(1). org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111256
  56. Wei, M., Shaffer, P.A., Young, S.K., & Zakalik, R.A. (2005). Adult Attachment, Shame, Depression, and Loneliness: The Mediation Role of Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(4), 591–601. org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.4.591
  57. Wright, T.A., & Bonett, D.G. (2007). Job Satisfaction and Psychological Well-Being as Nonadditive Predictors of Workplace Turnover. Journal of Management, 33(2), 141–160. doi.org/10.1177/0149206306297582
  58. Wright, T.A., & Cropanzano, R. (2000). Psychological well-being and job satisfaction as predictors of job performance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(1), 84–94. doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.1.84
  59. Yang, Y., Bojan Obrenovic, Kamotho, D.W., Danijela Godinic, & Ostic, D. (2024). Enhancing Job Performance: The Critical Roles of Well-Being, Satisfaction, and Trust in Supervisor. Behavioral Sciences, 14(8), 688–688. doi.org/10.3390/bs14080688
  60. Yamaguchi, K., Ito, M., Yoshitake Takebayashi, M.H., & Hofmann, S.G. (2022). Affective styles and their association with anxiety and depression in a Japanese clinical sample. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 29(4), 1481–1487. org/10.1002/cpp.2707
  61. Ye, W., Zhao, H., Song, X., Li, Z., & Liang, J. (2022). The Effects of Insecure Attachment Style on Workplace Deviance: A Moderated Mediation Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.813708.