Psychological Researches in Management

Psychological Researches in Management

Designing and validating a coaching mindset measurement tool

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Administration, Qom University, Qom, Iran.
2 Master of Business Administration, Department of Administration, Qom University, Qom, Iran.
Abstract
Purpose: Given the significant growth of coaching in human resources and personal development, special attention is required in research. In the definition of coaching, the competencies required for each coach are important factors that affect the coaching process. Among the competencies mentioned, the coach's mindset is one of the main foundations that has been less addressed. In other words, thoughts, beliefs, and expectations, whether conscious or unconscious, have a significant impact on coaches. Finding factors that cause recognition and examination of mindset can help stakeholders identify who has this mindset. The notable issue is that, considering the competencies of coaching, a coach must have a mindset appropriate to coaching, and is considered a key component of what a coach is. By definition, the coaching mindset is that a coach has an open, curious, flexible, and client-centered mindset. The purpose of the present study is to design an instrument to measure the mindset of coaching.
Design/Methodology/Approach: The present study was conducted in the form of an interpretive paradigm and with a qualitative research approach. The research was descriptive and without researcher intervention. The purpose of the study is also considered fundamental. The qualitative data collection tool was semi-structured interviews, and the statistical population of the qualitative research included coaches from all coaching departments, university professors, and coaching process experts who were fully aware of the competencies and process of coaching and were familiar with the research topic. The sampling method was carried out using the snowball technique. The sampling criterion among the statistical population was also having at least one year of coaching experience or writing works related to coaching or teaching it at the university level, which ultimately identified 11 samples. The researcher used the content analysis approach and the MAXQDA qualitative data analysis software version 2020 to analyze the data. Based on the aforementioned technique, 3 coding stages were carried out, including descriptive coding, interpretive coding, and the formation of a comprehensive thematic network.
Findings: The findings of the qualitative part of the study led to the identification of 69 sub-themes and 10 main themes for the coaching mindset. The extracted indicators include the accepting mindset of the other, positive thinking, systematic mindset, client strength mindset, self-aware mindset, non-judgmental mindset, focused mind, seeing people as selective, the developmental mindset of others, and seeing others as valuable.
Discussion and Conclusion: The findings emphasize the importance of the influence of the coach's mindset on the competencies and coaching process. Another accepting mindset means that people should be accepted on their terms. Note that change may take time for clients because the time to change varies from person to person. To effectively implement processes, a coach must always be hopeful about the future and be confident that the process will be fruitful, and his main focus should be on the future instead of the past. By understanding different systems and the relationships between them, and being aware of his role and position in each, such a person can assess his level of influence and effectiveness and work to improve and enhance the systems in his environment. Client empowerment includes belief in one's resourcefulness and ability, internal control, creativity, self-awareness, and knowledge. Each person is considered the best expert in his own life. A person with a coaching mindset should not try to diagnose and simulate the problems of others, because the human brain always looks for similarities. He should try to turn off his expertise during the coaching conversation, neither processing nor analyzing the information received from others, but allowing the client to make his own decisions. When a person has a mindset appropriate for coaching, he tries to be fully present when talking to others. A coach with a mindset appropriate for coaching values ​​everyone around him and sees himself as their equal; neither superior nor inferior. Such a mindset encourages him to take the initiative in various matters to help others. The coach should see others as equals in his mind and see himself as the same level as the client, which includes a sense of equality and egalitarianism.
Keywords

Subjects


  1. دکارت، رنه (1381). تأملات فلسفی اول (سیداحمد احمدی، مترجم). تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
  2. سالدنا، جانی (1395). راهنمای کدگذاری برای پژوهشگران کیفی (عبدالله گیویان، مترجم). تهران: انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی (آموزش انقلاب اسلامی).
  3. شریعتی، فهیمه، و حسینی شاهرودی، سید مرتضی (1392). ذهن و تأثیرات بی‌واسطة آن از نظر ملاصدرا. حکمت صدرایی، 2(1)، 71- 84. org/20.1001.1.23221992.1392.2.1.7.6
  4. صدرالدین شیرازی، محمد بن ابراهیم، خواجوی، محمد، و نوری، علی بن جمشید (1363). مفاتیح الغیب. تهران: مؤسسۀ مطالعات و تحقیقات فرهنگی، انجمن اسلامی حکمت و فلسفه ایران.
  5. معین، محمد (1350). فرهنگ فارسی معین. تهران: مؤسسۀ انتشاراتی امیرکبیر.

 

References

  1. Anderson, V. (2013). A Trojan Horse? The implications of managerial coaching for leadership theory. Human Resource Development International, 16(3), 251–266. doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2013.771868
  2. Andrews, H., & Jones, R.J. (2024). Can one-to-one coaching improve selection success and who benefits most? The role of internship candidate generalised self-efficacy. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 17(2), 147–162. doi.org/10.1080/17521882.2023.2300799
  3. Barratt-Pugh, L., Hodge, S., & Smith, E. (2018). Learning and development practitioners: identity, profession and future trajectory. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources. doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12207
  4. Brotman, L.E., Liberi, W.P., & Wasylyshyn, K.M. (1998). Executive coaching: The need for standards of competence. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 50(1), 40–46. doi.org/10.1037/1061-4087.50.1.40
  5. Cannon, M., Douglas, S., & Butler, D. (2021). Developing Coaching Mindset and Skills. Management Teaching Review, 6(4), 330-349. doi.org/10.1177/23792981211006877
  6. Churchman, W. (1968). The Systems Approach. New York: A Delta Book.
  7. Descartes, R. (2002). First Philosophical Reflections. (S.A. Ahmadi, Trans.). Tehran: University Publishing Center. (In Persian)
  8. Dhawan, M. (2021). ICF Core Competencies: Embodying a Coaching Mindset. ICF. Retrieved from May 2024 https://coachingfederation.org/blog/embodies-a-coaching-mindset
  9. Downes, P.W., & Collins, D. (2022). Developing strength and conditioning coaches: a case for cognitive apprenticeship. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 16(1), 87–99. doi.org/10.1080/17521882.2022.2089189
  10. Ellinger, A.D., Ellinger, A.E., & Keller, S. B. (2003). Supervisory coaching behavior, employee satisfaction, and warehouse employee performance: A dyadic perspective in the distribution industry. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 14(4), 435–458. doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1078
  11. Ennis, S.A., Hodgetts, W.H., Otto, J., Stern, L.R., Vitti, M., & Yahanda, N. (2004). The Executive Coaching Handbook: Principles and Guidelines for a Successful Coaching Partnership. The Executive Coaching Forum, Wellesley.
  12. Gilley, A., Gilley, J.W., & Kouider, E. (2010). Characteristics of managerial coaching. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 23(1), 53–70. doi.org/10.1002/piq.20075
  13. Grant, A.M., Passmore, J., Cavanagh, M., & Parker, H. (2010). The state of play in coaching. International Review of Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 3(25), 125–168. doi.org/10.1002/9780470661628
  14. Hagen, M. S., & Peterson, S. L. (2014). Coaching Scales. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(2), 222–241. doi.org/10.1177/1523422313520203.
  15. Hale, D.P. (2008). Development of a validated core competency skill set for executive coaches. (Ph.D. 3334045), Northcentral University, United States -- Arizona. Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/304823133?accountid=35812
  16. International Coach Federation. (2019). Available at: http://www.coachfederation.org
  17. Jones, R.J., Woods, S. A., & Guillaume, Y. R. (2016). The effectiveness of workplace coaching: A meta‐analysis of learning and performance outcomes from coaching. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89(2), 249-277. doi.org/10.1111/joop.12119
  18. Joo, B.-K. (Brian). (2005). Executive Coaching: A Conceptual Framework From an Integrative Review of Practice and Research. Human Resource Development Review, 4(4), 462–488. doi.org/10.1177/1534484305280866
  19. Kapoutzis, N., Whiley, L.A., Yarker, J., & Lewis, R. (2023). Coaching culture: an evidence review and framework for future research and practice. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 17(1), 50–76. doi.org/10.1080/17521882.2023.2250458
  20. King, N. & Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in qualitative research. Sage, London.
  21. Lowery, K. (2019). Educators’ perceptions of the value of coach mindset development for their well-being, International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 8(4), 310-324. doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-02-2019-0032
  22. Merriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Oxford: Routledge.
  23. McCarthy, G., & Milner, J. (2013). Managerial coaching: Challenges, opportunities and training. Journal of Management Development, 32(7), 768–779. doi.org/10.1108/JMD-11-2011-0113
  24. Moein, M. (1977). Moein's Persian Dictionary. Tehran: Amirkabir Publishing House. (In Persian)
  25. Molyn, J., de Haan, E., van der Veen, R., & Gray, D.E. (2021). The impact of common factors on coaching outcomes. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 15(2), 214–227. doi.org/10.1080/17521882.2021.1958889
  26. O’Donovan, R., Loughnane, C., Donnelly, J., Kelly, R., Kemp, D., McCarthy, L., …, & Dunne, P.J. (2024). Healthcare workers’ experience of a coach-led digital platform for better well-being. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 17(2), 207–225. doi.org/10.1080/17521882.2024.2304793
  27. Ong, A.M.L., & Siau, K. (2022). Value of a Growth Mindset: Improving Endoscopy Coaching and Mentoring. Digestive Diseases And Sciences, 67(3), 753–756. doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07294-7
  28. Ouanhlee, T. (2023). Learning Human Resources and Applying it to Real-Life Situations. International Journal of Human Resource, 16(2), 13-26. doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v16n2p13
  29. Oxford Dictionaries English. (2017).
  30. Özduran, A., & Tanova, C. (2017). Coaching and employee organizational citizenship behaviours: The role of procedural justice climate. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 60, 58–66. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.10.004
  31. Rindlisbacher, D. (2020). Coach Mindset: Preparing Leaders to Create a Climate of Trust and Value. Nursing Administration Quarterly. 44(3), 251-256. doi.org/10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000430
  32. Sadr al-Din Shirazi, M.I.E., Khawaji, M., & Nouri, A.I.J. (1984). The Keys to the Unseen. Tehran: Institute of Cultural Studies and Research, Islamic Society of Wisdom and Philosophy of Iran. (In Persian)
  33. Saldana, J. (2016). Coding Guide for Qualitative Researchers. (A. Givyan, Trans.). Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications (Islamic Revolution Education). (In Persian)
  34. Segers, J., Vloeberghs, D., Henderickx, E., & Inceoglu, I. (2011). Structuring and understanding the coaching industry: The coaching cube. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(2), 204–221. doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2011.62798930
  35. Shariati, F., & Hosseini Shahroudi, S.M. (2013). The Mind and Its Direct Effects from the Perspective of Mulla Sadra. Hekmat Sadraei, 2(1), 71-84. doi.org/20.1001.1.23221992.1392.2.1.7.6 (In Persian)
  36. Terblanche, N.H.D., van Heerden, M., & Hunt, R. (2024). The influence of an artificial intelligence chatbot coach assistant on the human coach-client working alliance. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 17(2), 189–206. doi.org/10.1080/17521882.2024.2304792
  37. Theeboom, T., Beersma, B., & van Vianen, A.E.M. (2013). Does coaching work? A meta-analysis on the effects of coaching on individual level outcomes in an organizational context. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(1), 1–18. doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.837499
  38. Walling, A.L. (2015). Role of inquiry in executive coaching: perceived interactions between relational and conversational competencies to inform client outcomes [Doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University].
  39. Wangrow, D.B., Schepker, D.J., & Barker, V.L. (2018). Power, performance, and expectations in the dismissal of NBA coaches: A survival analysis study. Sport Management Review, 21(4), 333–346. doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2017.08.002
  40. Weiss, J.A., & Merrigan, M. (2021). Employee coachability: New insights to increase employee adaptability, performance, and promotability in organizations. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 19(1), 121–136. doi.org/10.24384/kfmw-ab52
  41. Williams, E.P. (2017). What are the challenges of introducing internal coaching in a VUCA context?. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, S11, 18-29. https://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/items/6c720684-12b2-417d-8a82-08659802cc47/1/
  42. Wilson, C. (2004). Coaching and coach training in the workplace. Industrial and Commercial Training, 36(3), 96–98. doi.org/10.1108/00197850410532087
  43. Witherspoon, R., & White, R.P. (1996). Executive coaching: A continuum of roles. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 48(2), 124–133. doi.org/10.1037/1061-4087.48.2.124