Psychological Researches in Management

Psychological Researches in Management

Antecedents and Consequences of Job Elevation Sickness among Managers in the Public Sector

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran. Corresponding Author, Email: z.mohamadyari@ilam.ac.ir
2 Associate Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran. Email: a.shiri@ilam.ac.ir
Abstract
Purpose: Job elevation sickness occurs when individuals are abruptly promoted without adequate experience, preparation, or systematic planning. Such managers often display unusual behaviors, possess limited decision‑making authority, and experience high job stress. This phenomenon can undermine the integrity of promotion systems, disrupt workplace dynamics, and demotivate diligent employees who feel their efforts are overlooked. A major consequence is the erosion of organizational trust, alongside the rise of underqualified leaders whose lack of essential competencies weakens team performance. Recognizing the causes and effects of job elevation sickness enables organizations to support smoother role transitions. Studying its antecedents and consequences in the public sector is therefore both theoretically important and practically significant, guiding the central research question of this study.
Design/Methodology/Approach: This study is qualitative in nature and conducted using an exploratory approach. In terms of purpose, it is classified as basic (fundamental) research. Philosophically, the study adopts an interpretivist stance, and methodologically, it follows an inductive approach. With regard to the time horizon, it is a cross-sectional study. Data collection was based on semi-structured interviews, and data analysis was performed using thematic analysis. Given the research objective, namely, identifying the antecedents and consequences of a novel phenomenon (job elevation sickness) within the specific context of public-sector organizations, thematic analysis was selected as the most appropriate method, as it is particularly well-suited for exploratory and interpretive studies aimed at uncovering a broad spectrum of influencing factors and outcomes associated with a phenomenon. The participants include experts comprising middle- and top-level managers from executive agencies and public organizations in Ilam Province, as well as university faculty members and researchers familiar with the research topic. Due to the qualitative nature of the study, purposive sampling was employed. The primary data collection instrument was the semi-structured interview. To ensure the instrument’s validity, the peer and participant debriefing method was applied. Specifically, during the development of the interview guide for this study, input was obtained from two subject-matter experts as peer reviewers and from two interviewees as participant reviewers. To assess reliability, the test–retest method was used. Data analysis was carried out using thematic analysis.
Findings: The findings revealed that job elevation sickness among public sector managers consists of five main antecedent themes (comprising 13 sub-themes) and five main consequent themes (also comprising 13 sub-themes). The antecedents were categorized into individual-cognitive, structural-organizational, cultural-social, psychosocial-personality, and contextual factors. The consequences were identified as reduced organizational efficiency, psychosocial-physical outcomes, weakened organizational and social trust, deterioration of organizational culture and human relations, and political-administrative consequences. The results indicate that this phenomenon is not merely an individual issue, but rather a multifaceted outcome of inefficient organizational structures, non-supportive cultures, social pressures, and technological transformations. The findings of the present study indicate that job elevation sickness among public-sector managers is a multidimensional phenomenon rooted in the failure of merit-based systems, weaknesses in governance structures, and non-supportive organizational cultures. Its consequences extend beyond the individual level, permeating organizational, societal, and political spheres. These findings align with the Peter Principle; however, they go further by demonstrating that in highly politicized public-sector environments, job elevation sickness is not merely a result of individual incompetence, but rather a product of an opaque promotion system entangled with informal power networks.
Discussion and Conclusion: This study, through the multidimensional identification and analysis of the antecedents and consequences of job elevation sickness among public-sector managers, concludes that this phenomenon is not merely an individual issue but rather the complex outcome of an interplay of individual, structural, cultural, psychological, and contextual factors that converge within the specific context of public organizations. The findings indicate that job elevation occurs when managers are transferred to higher-level positions without adequate preparedness, insufficient organizational support, and without undergoing gradual developmental pathways. Factors such as opaque performance evaluation systems, interference by informal networks, social pressures, and a non-supportive organizational culture accelerate these promotions. Rather than enhancing performance, such practices weaken organizational effectiveness, foster occupational burnout, erode trust, and reinforce informal power structures. Ultimately, job elevation sickness affects not only the newly appointed manager but also the entire organization and public trust in governmental institutions. To mitigate this phenomenon, public organizations must establish transparent, competence-based evaluation and promotion systems; design structured, gradual training programs and mentoring initiatives for newly appointed managers; cultivate a supportive and transformation-oriented organizational culture; implement digital change management policies alongside managerial promotions; and strengthen independent oversight mechanisms to monitor promotion processes.
Keywords

Subjects


منابع فارسی
1.      فلاح آشنا آباد، فروغ، نظریان مادوانی، عباس، و نوروزی سید حسینی، رسول (1402). شناسایی فرایند شکل‌گیری موانع ارتقای شغلی و مؤلفه‌های تأثیرگذار بر اکوسیستم کاری بانوان در سازمان‌های ورزشی ایران. فصلنامۀ مدیریت ورزشی، 61، 62-76.  https://doi.org/10.22059/jsm.2021.297490.2449
2.      یاسینی، علی، رضایی خواه، هدایت، تابان، محمد، و زین آبادی، حسن رضا (1395). شناسایی الگوهای ذهنی کارکنان دانشگاه ایلام در خصوص ارتقای شغلی با کاربست روش کیو. فصلنامۀ مدیریت سازمان‌های دولتی، 17، 107-120.  https://doi.org/20.1001.1.2322522.1395.5.0.6.4
References
1.       Anggraini, N. (2024). The influence of work environment and work motivation on employee performance. Journal of Economics and Business Letters, 4(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.55942/jebl.v4i1.273
2.       Anja, P. (2020). Discrimination in promotion. Journal of Burnout in Organizations, 12(3), 34-51. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3616963
3.       Artis, A., Ottaviani, F., & Ribeiro, L. (2025). Informal governance and day-to-day management: Mechanisms for inclusion and diversity in nonprofit organizations. Journal of Management and Governance, 30(1), 782-804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-025-09769-5
4.       Bakker, A.B., & Demerouti, E. (2016). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056 
5.       Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2008). Managing performance: International comparisons. Routledge.
6.       Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
7.       Bußwolder, P., Dregert, S., & Letmathe, P. (2019). Consequences of unfair job promotions in organizations. Schmalenbach Business Review, 71(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41464-019-00068-9
8.       Chintaluri, M.G., Bala Subramanian R., & Choudhary, A. (2023). Team member’s promotion: Injustice or promotion in haste?. Asian Journal of Management Cases, 22(2), 162-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/09728201231189949
9.       Dadfarnia, S., Taherifar, Z., & Farahani, H. (2023). Emotion regulation strategies as a mediator of the relationship of beliefs about emotion and emotion regulation self-efficacy, and social anxiety.               Practice in Clinical Psychology, 11(4), 287-296. http://jpcp.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-879-en.html
10.    DeVaro, J., Ghosh, S., & Zoghi, C. (2018). Job characteristics and labor market discrimination in promotions. A Journal of Economy and Society, 57(3), 389–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/irel.12211
11.    Eric, W.C. (2018). Promotion, relative performance information, and the Peter principle. The Accounting Review, 93(3), 83–103. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51890
12.    Fallah Ashenaabad, F., Nazarian Madavani, A., & Norouzi Seyed Hosseini, R. (1402). Identifying the process of forming career promotion barriers and the factors affecting the work ecosystem of women in Iranian sports organizations. Journal of Sports Management, 61, 76-62. https://doi.org/10.22059/jsm.2021.297490.2449 (In Persian)
13.    Farazmand, A., De Simone, E., Gaeta, G.L., & Capasso, S. (2022). Corruption, lack of transparency and the misuse of public funds in times of crisis: An introduction. Public Organization Review, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-022-00651-8
14.    Firdaus, A. H., Firdaus, M., & Hidayah, T. (2024). The effect of job promotion and competence on employee performance through career development. Innovation Business Management and Accounting Journal, 3(4), 471–485. https://doi.org/10.56070/ibmaj.2024.050
15.    He, Z., Huang, H., Choi, H., & Bilgihan, A. (2023). Building organizational resilience with digital transformation. Journal of Service Management, 34(1), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-06-2021-0216
16.    Heinrich, T. (2019). Discussion of consequences of unfair job promotions in organizations. Schmalenbach Business Review, 71, 27–33. ‌ https://doi.org/10.1007/s41464-019-00071-0
17.    Hofstede Insights. (2023). Country comparison tool: Iran. https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison/iran/
18.    Mangum, M., & Block, R. (2021). Perceived racial discrimination, racial resentment, and support for affirmative action and preferential hiring and promotion: a multi-racial analysis. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 10(4), 674–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2021.1892781
19.    Marcy, R.T. (2023). Reflections on gaps in public sector leadership development theory. International Journal of Public Leadership, 19(4), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPL-02-2023-0009
20.    Maslach, C., & Leiter, M.P. (2020). Burnout: The cost of caring (3rd Ed.). Cambridge University Press.
21.    Mutonyi, B.R., Slåtten, T., & Lien, G. (2020). Empowering leadership, work group cohesiveness, individual learning orientation and individual innovative behaviour in the public sector: Empirical evidence from Norway. International Journal of Public Leadership, 16(2), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPL-07-2019-0045
22.    Nag, D., Arena, D.F., & Jones, K.P. (2022). How promotion loss shapes expectations of discrimination: An intersectional approach. Gender in Management, 37(4), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-02-2021-0048  
23.    Perry, J.L., & Hondeghem, A. (2008). Motivation in public management: The call of public service. Oxford University Press.
24.    Peter, L.J., & Hull, R. (1969). The Peter Principle: Why things always go wrong. William Morrow.
25.    Prummer, A. (2020). Discrimination in promotion. Journal of Burnout in Organizations, 12(3), 34–51. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3616963
26.    Putnam, R. D. (2020). The unravelling of community trust: Social capital in the digital age. Harvard University Press.
27.    Ramos, A., Latorre, F., Tomás, I., & Ramos, J. (2022). Women’s promotion to management and unfairness perceptions—A challenge to the social sustainability of the organizations and beyond. Sustainability, 14(2), 788. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020788 
28.    Russen, M.Dawson, M., & Madera, J.M. (2021). Gender discrimination and perceived fairness in the promotion process of hotel employees. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(1), 327-345. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-07-2020-0647   
29.    Sheaffer, Z., Levy, S., & Navot, E. (2018). Fears, discrimination and perceived workplace promotion. Baltic Journal of Management, 13(1), 2–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-05-2017-0165
30.    Tadesse Bogale, A., & Debela, K.L. (2024). Organizational culture: A systematic review. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 209-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2340129
31.    Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). https://alnap.cdn.ngo/media/documents/tajfel-turner-1979-compressed.pdf  
32.    Udayar, S., Urbanaviciute, I., Maggiori, C., & Jérôme, R. (2024). Does promotion foster career sustainability? A comparative three-wave study on the role of promotion in work stress, job satisfaction, and career-related performance. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 24(3), 556-671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-024-09694-3
33.    Vinnikov, D., Brimkulov, N., Krasotski, V., Redding-Jones, R., & Blanc, P.D. (2014). Risk factors for occupational acute mountain sickness. Occupational Medicine, 64(7), 483–489. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqu094
34.    Yasini, A., Rezaiekhah, H., Taban, M., & Zeinabadi, H.R. (2016). Identifying the mental patterns of Ilam University employees regarding career promotion using the Q method. Journal of Government Organization Management, 17, 107-120. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.2322522.1395.5.0.6.4 (In Persian)
35.    Zila-Velasque, J.P., Grados-Espinoza, P., Morán-Mariños, C., Morales Pocco, K.O., Capcha-Jimenez, U.S., & Ortiz-Benique, Z.N. (2023). Adaptation and altitude sickness: A 40-year bibliometric analysis and collaborative networks. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1069212. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1069212