Psychological Researches in Management

Psychological Researches in Management

The role of psychological empowerment in relation between occupational fitness and organizational intimacy

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Associate Professor, HR Management, Faculty of Humanities, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran.
Abstract
Purpose: Intimacy means to share inner wishes and to show sympathy for others. Organizational intimacy makes efficient management and motivated employees and finally leads to organizational progress and prosperity. Those employees who accept their job and are satisfied with it show intimacy with co-workers and can build a space for different groups to feel accepted and supported, and to be able to cooperate. In establishing organizational intimacy career fitness emphasizes the role of psychological factors such as empowerment. Therefore, intimacy within an organization not only reflects career fitness and people persistence factors in their job but also other aspects such as employees’ psychological empowerment are involved which have been unnoticed in previous studies. Moreover, studies on career fitness and organizational intimacy mostly agree on the necessity of further research in this regard. About existing evidence and experience during recent years, the importance of employees’ career fitness within public organizations and considering career fitness as an effective factor in organizational intimacy while respecting the mediative role of psychological empowerment have not been studied. In this regard, the present study has been carried out with the aim of mediative role of psychological empowerment in relation between career fitness and organizational intimacy.
Design/Methodology/Approach: The present study is an applied descriptive survey in terms of its purpose and implementation method. The population of the study consisted of 35875 employees working in Ilan public organizations among which 380 were selected as sample size using Cochran’s formula. A questionnaire was applied to collect data and evaluate the relation between various variables. To evaluate the variable of career fitness, two dimensions of organizational fitness and society fitness were extracted from the questionnaire by Adams et al. (2010), and also five dimensions of competence, autonomy, influence, significance, and trust were obtained from the questionnaire by Spreitzer (1995) and Mishra (1997) to evaluate psychological empowerment, three dimensions of organizational climate, organizational understanding and amity were extracted to evaluate organizational intimacy through the questionnaire by Ebrahimzadeh (2019). To ensure the reliability of research constructs, the Alpha Cronbach way was applied. The value of the Alpha Cronbach coefficient was more than 0.7 indicating appropriate reliability of research constructs. Kolmogorov Smirnov test was used to examine normality and non-normality of data at a significance level of 5%. Since the obtained significance level was less than 5%, the data was not normal. To evaluate the validity of constructs, structural equations way was applied in SmartPLS that obtained figures out of which were less than 0.5 hence research constructs had appropriate validity.
Findings: To examine model fitness, the GOF index was applied during this study. The value of GOF was 0.8251 indicating very suitable fitness of the model. Some coefficients were obtained in testing research hypotheses using Structural equations in SmartPLS which all were significant because the value of their significance test was more than 1.96. Therefore, all of the hypotheses of the study were confirmed. Moreover, as the mediative variable of Psychological Empowerment existed in this study, the Sobel test was applied. The value of the Z-value obtained by the Sobel test was 9.71 which was more than 1.96. Therefore, it can be stated that the mediative impact of Psychological Empowerment on the relation between career fitness and organizational intimacy was significant at a confidence level of 95 percent.
Discussion and Conclusions: Results of this study showed that career fitness has a positive significant impact on organizational intimacy and also psychological empowerment plays a mediative role in the relationship between career fitness and organizational intimacy. The obtained results through this study correlated to findings by Yoon et al. (2022), Hum et al. (2024), Valizadeh Zanouz and Moghtaderzadeh Maleki Moghadam (2016), and Faraz et al. (2023). Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen career fitness and Employees’ psychological empowerment at all aspects to take advantage of organizational intimacy benefits. Employees with suitable career fitness usually develop the benefits of their organizations, accept group goals by focus and awareness and concentrating on them, motivate others, and make the ground for their organization which leads to organizational intimacy. Also, one of the logical and efficient ways to promote organizational intimacy is to proper implementation of empowerment among employees which would have a positive impact on performance and productivity.
Keywords

Subjects


  1.  

    1. بیک‌زاده، جعفر (1401). ارائۀ مدل ساختاری تأثیر رهبری دانشی و سلامت سازمانی درک‌شده بر شور و شوق کاری با تأکید بر نقش میانجی صمیمیت سازمانی. فصلنامۀ مدیریت و چشمانداز آموزش، 4(4)، 42-22. org/10.22034/jmep.2023.380739.1151
    2. جابری منش، عذرا، شیری، اردشیر، و تابان، محمد (1398). فهم شکل‌گیری صمیمیت سازمانی با استفاده از روش داده‌بنیاد. مجلۀ مدیریت سازمان های دولتی، 7(2)، 26-11. org/10.30473/ipom.2019.40971.3225
    3. حاتمی ورزنه، ابوالفضل، معینی، حسین، و حیدر میمه، محدثه (1403). بررسی رابطۀ نیازهای اساسی روان‌شناختی، سرسختی روان‌شناختی و سبک‌های مقابله با فشار روانی با موفقیت مدیران زن فروش. پژوهشهای روانشناختی در مدیریت، 10(3)، 110-85. org/10.22034/jom.2024.2033513.1224
    4. حسنی، رفیق، توکلی، معصومه، و زندی، خلیل (1395).نقش میانجی توانمندسازی روان‌شناختی در تبیین ارتباط رهبری تحول‌آفرین و درگیری شغلی کارکنان. مدیریت فرهنگ سازمانی، 14(3)، 907-883. https://jomc.ut.ac.ir/article_58904.html
    5. حمزوی، حسین، متقی نژاد، محمد، خادمی، عبدالواسع، و رضایی منش، بهروز (1403). تاثیر مدیریت منابع انسانی دانش بر عملکرد پایدار با نقش میانجی توانمندسازی روان‌شناختی. پژوهشهای روانشناختی در مدیریت، 10(1)، 91-69. org/10.22034/jom.2024.2010209.1109
    6. خواجه، نجمه، زائری، سمیه، و تاجیک، افسانه (1398). طراحی و آزمون الگویی از پیامدهای سازمانی برازندگی شغلی. مشاورۀ شغلی و سازمانی، 11(41)، 44-24. https://jcoc.sbu.ac.ir/article_100001.html
    7. خانی، احمد، دلخواه، جلیل، و خائف الهی، احمدعلی (1397). واکاوی عناصر چسبندگی شغلی: پژوهشی آمیخته. فصلنامۀ مدیریت دولتی، 10(3)، 480-459. 22059/jipa.2018.264662.2351
    8. زوار، تقی، شبا بسیم، فرناز، و مهدی‌زاده، جعفر (1400). پیش‌بینی عملکرد شغلی معلمان بر اساس توانمندسازی روان‌شناختی و سبک رهبری مدیران. اندیشه‌های نوین تربیتی، 17(1)، 182-161. org/10.22051/jontoe.2021.18898.2099
    9. عباسی، مریم، و رحیمی، حمید (1399). تأثیر درهم‌تنیدگی شغلی بر رفتار شهروندی سازمانی و عملکرد شغلی دبیران مدارس متوسطه. فصلنامۀ علمی پژوهشی مدیریت مدرسه، 8(4)، 199-182. org/10.34785/J010.2021.114
    10. عسکری‌نیا، محمدحسین، احمدی، سیدعلی اکبر، ویسه، صیدمهدی و رسولی، رضا (1403). بررسی تأثیر رهبری پدرسالارانه بر مدیریت کارکنان مشکل‌آفرین: نقش میانجی به‏زیستی و توانمندسازی روان‏شناختی. پژوهشهای روانشناختی در مدیریت، 10(3)، 111-133. org/10.22034/jom.2024.2030956.1216
    11. مقتدرزاده ملکی مقدم، احمدعلی، و ولی‌زاده زنوز، سیما (1395). تعیین تأثیر صمیمیت سازمانی بر رضایت شغلی کارکنان بانک مسکن استان آذربایجان شرقی. همایش بین‌المللی انسجام مدیریت و اقتصاد در توسعة شهری، تهران. https://civilica.com/doc/563122
    12. ملکیان، هادی و آشتیانی، محمدرضا (1398). بررسی تاثیر چسبندگی شغلی بر ترک شغل داوطلبانه (مطالعه موردی: اساتید حق التد ریس دانشگاه پیام نور مرکز بیجار). پژوهش‌های کاربردی در مدیریت و حسابداری، 12(3)، 95-103. org/10.22059/jipa.2018.264662.2351
    13. قریشیان، سید علی، سرلک، محمدعلی، غلامرضایی، داوود، و رحیمیان، اشرف (1402). شناسایی عوامل ارتقای صمیمیت سازمانی در شرایط دورکاری: رویکرد تحلیل محتوا. پژوهشهای مدیریت منابع انسانی، 13(3)، 20-1. http://ormr.modares.ac.ir/article-28-70112-fa.html
    14. قربی، نسرین (1401). بررسی تأثیر فضیلت سازمانی بر اعتماد سازمانی با نقش میانجی صمیمیت سازمانی (مورد مطالعه: معلمان مقطع ابتدایی شهرستان رشتخوار). هفتمین کنفرانس ملی نوآوری و تحقیق در مدیریت، روانشناسی و آموزش و پرورش (صص. 1-13). https://civilica.com/doc/1657523

    References

    1. Abbasi, M., & Rahimi, H. (2019). The effect of job involvement on organizational citizenship behavior and job performance of secondary school teachers. Scientific Research Quarterly of School Management, 8(4), 199-182. org/10.34785/J010.2021.114 (In Persian)
    2. Askarinia, M.H., Ahmadi, S.A.A, Vaiseh, S.M., & Rasouli, R. (2024). Examining the effect of patriarchal leadership on the management of problematic employees: the mediating role of well-being and psychological empowerment. Psychological Research in Management, 10(3), 111-133. doi.org/10.22034/jom.2024.2030956.1216 (In Persian)
    3. Adams, G. A., Webster, J. R., & Buyarski, D. M. (2010). Development of an occupational embeddedness measure. Career Development International, 15(5), 420-436.org/10.1108/13620431011075312
    4. Arici, H.E., Arasli, H., Köseoglu, M.A., Sokmen, A., & Arici, N.C. (2023). Job embeddedness in hospitality and tourism scholarship: Past, present, and future research agenda. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 109. doi.org/1016/j.ijhm.2022.103417
    5. Beikzadeh, J. (2022). Presenting a structural model of the effect of knowledge leadership and perceived organizational health on work enthusiasm with an emphasis on the mediating role of organizational intimacy. Education Management and Perspective Quarterly, 4(4), 22-42. org/10.22034/jmep.2023.380739.1151 (In Persian)
    6. Bellis, P., Buganza, T., & Verganti, R. (2023). What kind of intimacy is meaningful to you? How intimate interactions foster individuals' sensemaking of innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 32(3), 407-424. org/10.1111/caim.12568
    7. Bomsta, H., & Kerr, J. (2023). Organizational Resilience of Intimate Partner Abuse Nonprofits During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 9(2), 197-223. org/10.20899/jpna.9.2.197.223
    8. Candan, H. (2016). A research on the relationship between job embeddedness with performance and burnout of academicians in Turkey. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 18(3), 68-80. doi.org/9790/487X-1803026880
    9. Çetinkaya, B., & Yeşilada, T. (2022). Inclusive leadership and employee innovative work behaviours: Testing a psychological empowerment and leader-member exchange moderated-mediation model. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 32(1), 15–20. doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2021.2002035
    10. Faraz, N.A., Xiong, Z., Mehmood, S.A., Ahmed, F., & Pervaiz, K. (2023). How does servant leadership nurture nurses’ job embeddedness? Uncovering sequential mediation of psychological contract fulfillment and psychological ownership. Journal of Nursing Management, 23(1), 1-11. org/10.1155/2023/7294334
    11. Farzana, S., & Charoensukmongkol, P. (2024). Effects of transformational leadership on psychological empowerment and employee engagement: a comparative study of Bangladesh and Thailand. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 25(3), 456-463. doi.org/10.1108/JABS-07-2023-0256
    12. Hahm, S.Y., Gu, M., & Sok, S. (2024). Influences of communication ability, organizational intimacy, and trust among colleagues on job satisfaction of nurses in comprehensive nursing care service units. Frontiers in Public Health, 26(12), 135-14612.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1354972
    13. Hamzavi, H,. Motaghi Nejad, M., Khademi, A., & Rezaei Menesh, B. (1403). The effect of knowledge human resources management on sustainable performance with the mediating role of psychological empowerment. Psychological Research in Management, 10(1), 69-91. org/10.22034/jom.2024.2010209.1109 (In Persian)
    14. Hatami Varzaneh, A., Moini, H., & Haider Mimeh, M. (2024). Investigating the relationship between basic psychological needs, psychological toughness and styles of dealing with psychological pressure with the success of female sales managers. Psychological Research in Management, 10(3), 110-85. org/10.22034/jom.2024.2033513.1224 (In Persian)
    15. Haltom, B. (2001). Increasing human and social capital by applying job embeddedness theory. Organisational Dynamics, 35(4), 316−331. org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2006.08.007
    16. Hasani, f., Tavakoli, M., & Zandi, K. (2015). The mediating role of psychological empowerment in explaining the relationship between transformational leadership and employee job involvement. Managing Organizational Culture, 14(3), 883-907. (In Persian) https://jomc.ut.ac.ir/article_58904.html
    17. Jaberimanesh, O., Shiri, A., & Taban, M. (2018). Understanding the formation of organizational intimacy using the database method. Journal of Public Organization Management, 7(2), 11-26. (In Persian) org/10.30473/ipom.2019.40971.3225
    18. Karavardar, G. (2014). Perceived organizational support, psychological empowerment, organizational citizenship behavior, job performance and job embeddedness: A research on the fast food industry in Istanbul, Turkey. International Journal of Business and Management9(4), 131. doi.org/5539/ijbm.v9n4p131
    19. Khajeh, N., Zairi, S., & Tajik, A. (2018). Designing and testing a model of the organizational consequences of occupational fitness. Career and Organizational Counseling, 11(41), 24-44. (In Persian) https://jcoc.sbu.ac.ir/article_100001.html
    20. Khani, A., Kharfi, J., & Khaif Elahi, A. (2017). Examining the elements of occupational attachment: A mixed research. Government Management Quarterly, 10(3), 480-459.org/10.22059/jipa.2018.264662.2351. (In Persian)
    21. Khatoon, A., Rehman, S.U., Islam, T., & Ashraf, Y. (2024). Knowledge sharing through empowering leadership: the roles of psychological empowerment and learning goal orientation. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 73(4), 682-697. doi.org/1108/GKMC-08-2022-0194
    22. Kim, H. J., & Park, D. (2023). Effects of nursing professionalism and self-efficacy on job embeddedness in nurses. Heliyon, 9(6),1-8. doi.org/1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16991
    23. Klein, H.S. (2010). The Atlantic slave trade. Cambridge University Press.
    24. Liang, W.l., Nguyen, D.N., Tran, Q.N., & Truong, Q.T. (2023). Employee welfare and firm financial performance revisited. Managerial Finance, 49(2), 248-269. doi.org/10.1108/MF-02-2022-0095
    25. Qorbi, N. (2022). Investigating the effect of organizational virtue on organizational trust with the mediating role of organizational intimacy (case study: elementary school teachers in Rashtkhar city). 7th National Conference on Innovation and Research in Management, Psychology and Education (pp. 1-13). https://civilica.com/doc/1657523. (In Persian)
    26. Lucas, S. (2012). How much does it cost companies to lose employees. Retrieved January, 28(6), 1130-1142.
    27. March, J.G., & Simon, H.A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.
    28. Mitchell, T.R., Holtom, B.C., Lee, T.W., Sablynski, C.J., & Erez, M. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1102-1121. http://ereserve.library.utah.edu/Annual/MGT/7800/Brief/mitchell-2.pdf
    29. Mueller, C.W., & Price, J.L. (1981). Some consequences of turnover: A work unit analysis. Human Relations, 42(5), 389-402. org/10.1177/001872678904200502.
    30. Moqtadarzade Malki Moghadam, A., & Valizade Zenouz, S. (2015). Determining the effect of organizational intimacy on the job satisfaction of the housing bank employees of East Azarbaijan province. International Conference on Integration of Management and Economy in Urban Development, Tehran. https://civilica.com/doc/563122 (In Persian)
    31. Malekian, H., & Ashtiani, M. (2018). Investigating the effect of job attachment on voluntary job leaving (case study: professors of Haq Al-Ted Riz Payam Noor University, Bijar Center). Applied Research in Management and Accounting, 12(3), 95-103. org/10.22059/jipa.2018.264662.2351 (In Persian)
    32. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. org/10.1177/002224378101800104
    33. Granovetter, C. (1989). Love and work: An attachment-theoretical perspective. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 59(2), 270.org/10.1080/0267837080238396.
    34. Peltokorpi, V., & Allen, D.G. (2024). Job embeddedness and voluntary turnover in the face of job insecurity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 45(3), 416-433. org/10.1002/job.2728
    35. Qureshiyan, A., Sarlak, M., Gholamrezaei, D., and Rahimian, A. (2023). Identifying factors to promote organizational intimacy in remote working conditions: content analysis approach. Human Resource Management Research, 13(3), 1-20. http://ormr.modares.ac.ir/article-28-70112-fa.html (In Persian)
    36. Salari, M., & Nastiezaie, N. (2020). The relationship between transformational leadership and organizational intimacy with mediating role of organizational empathy. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 7(1), 51-60. doi.org/17220/ijpes.2020.01.005
    37. Sguera, F., Bagozzi, R.P., Huy, Q.N., Boss, R.W., & Boss, D.S. (2020). What we share is who we are and what we do: How emotional intimacy shapes organizational identification and collaborative behaviors. Applied Psychology, 69(3), 854-880. doi.org/1111/apps.12208
    38. Spreitzer, G.M. (1995). Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, Measurement and Validation. The Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.org/10.2307/256865
    39. Spreitzer, G.M., & Mishra, A. (1997). Survivor responses to downsizing: the mitigating effects of trust and empowerment. Los Angeles, California, United States: Southern California Studies Center, University of Southern California. org/10.1002/job.166.
    40. Teng, H.Y., & Chen, C.Y. (2024). Do job crafting and leisure crafting enhance job embeddedness: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 31(4), 1684-1701. org/10.1108/JHTI-04-2024-0314
    41. Theocharous, A., & Philaretou, A.G. (2011). Leisured Intimacy in Organizational Settings: An Exploratory Investigation. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 6(1), 207-225. org/10.18848/1833-1882/CGP/v06i01/51987
    42. Unanue, W., Gómez, M.E., Cortez, D., Oyanedel, J.C., & Mendiburo-Seguel, A. (2017). Revisiting the link between job satisfaction and life satisfaction: The role of basic psychological needs. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 680. org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00680
    43. Uy, F., Abendan, C.F., Kilag, O.K., Villegas, M.A., Ymas, S., & Pahayahay, D. (2024). Enhancing School Safety: Integrating William Glasser's Choice Theory in Crisis Preparedness and Response. International Journal of Qualitative Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IJQRISE), 1(1), 37-44. https://risejournals.org/index.php/imjrise/article/view/437
    44. Wamburi, A.O., Kibe, L., & Yatich, H. (2024). Influence of Customer Intimacy Strategy on Organisations’ Competitiveness in Tier III Category of Commercial Banks in Kenya. Eastern African Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2), 36-46. doi.org/58721/eajhss.v3i2.502
    45. Wu, Y., Groth, M., Zhang, K., & Minbashian, A. (2023). A meta-analysis of the impact of customer mistreatment on service employees' affective, attitudinal and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Service Management, 34(5), 896-940. org/10.1108/JOSM-08-2022-0262
    46. Yoon, D.Y., Han, C.S.H., Lee, S.K., Cho, J., Sung, M., & Han,J. (2022). The critical role of job embeddedness: The impact of psychological empowerment and learning orientation on organizational commitment. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1014186. doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1014186
    47. Zawar, T., Shaba Basim, F., & Mehdizadeh, J. (2021). Predicting teachers' job performance based on psychological empowerment and leadership style of managers. New Educational Thoughts, 17(1), 182-161. org/10.22051/jontoe.2021.18898.2099 (In Persian)
    48. Zhou, H., & Chen, J. (2021). How does psychological empowerment prevent emotional exhaustion? psychological safety and organizational embeddedness as mediators. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 754-870 org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.546687