Psychological Researches in Management

Psychological Researches in Management

Phenomenology of organizational power and its psychological approaches: an analysis of the phenomenon of osmotic pressure

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Public Management, Payame Noor University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2 Ph.D. in Curriculum Planning Studies, Educational Sciences Department, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
3 Ph.D. Student, Department of Public Management, Islamic Azad University of Khorasgan, Isfahan, Iran.
4 MA, Department of Public Management, Payam Noor University of Shahinshahr, Isfahan, Iran.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of the current research is to study power in educational organizations with a phenomenological approach. In this article, the phenomenon of power, resources, and its relative ability to explain the behavioral aspects of human resources in the organization have been investigated. Power is one of the important and necessary components in any organization, and how to acquire and apply it correctly and effectively is necessary for the survival of any system in today's world. Today's theorists consider the organization as a set of mutual relations and actions and reactions of individuals, where power is the most important factor in the nature and quality of these mutual relations. Power can be used in different parts of an organization and cause various results and consequences in that organization. Each of the sources of power and the combination of their different situations form different behavioral and conceptual models, and according to them, they create different interactive structures. The distance that those in power feel toward others makes them more likely to disobey the advice they hear.
 
Design/Methodology/Approach: The current research method is a qualitative phenomenological type, which is based on the lived experiences of the participants about the concept of power and its dimensions, as well as the tendency towards sources of power in the organization with the metaphor of osmotic pressure of chemistry. The participants of the research were the education experts of Semiram City, and a semi-structured interview was conducted with 13 experts using the purposeful sampling method and the theoretical saturation criterion of the findings. The analysis of the findings was done with the thematic analysis method. The evaluation criteria of qualitative research, including trustworthiness, transferability, reliability, and verifiability, were examined, and based on that, the validity and reliability of the research was confirmed.
 
Findings: By analyzing the findings, 122 basic themes, 25 organizing themes of the first level, and 5 organizing themes of the second level were identified and extracted, which were centered around the overarching theme of the phenomenon of organizational power. 5 organizing themes of the second level, including the concept of power, power sources, orientation to power sources, consequences of orientation to power sources, and power management solutions were identified. The participants expressed their experiences of orientation toward the sources of organizational power, including selection and appointment within the organization, individual experiences, osmosis phenomenon, organizational experiences, and gaining points. The participants expressed their experiences of the concept of power in the form of the concepts of dominance and influence, individual strength, some kind of need, being charismatic, ability and capacity, superiority, communicating, negative approach, positive approach, and position. They have also presented the themes of intercession and nepotism, individual factors, law and superiors as their experiences of sources of organizational power. On the other hand, they expressed their experiences of orientation toward organizational power sources, including selection and appointment within the organization, individual experiences, osmosis phenomenon, organizational experiences, and gaining privileges. The most important consequences of the tendency to sources of power include the marginalization of individual interests and attention to social interests, the use of violence and tyranny, and the ability to influence.
 
Discussion and Conclusion: The research results showed that some employees, despite weaknesses in their scientific knowledge, experience, and skills, manage to move from less powerful units within the organization towards positions of greater influence. These individuals seek to gain personal advantages through such upward mobility. To address this phenomenon, organizations should implement meritocratic selection processes, enforce regulations decisively, and foster a culture of cooperation, accountability, justice, and ethical conduct. The phenomenon of osmosis shows many legal and illegal functions in an organization. Weakness of people, flattery, unfairness, and most importantly, weakening of the rule of law in the organization are among the factors of the formation of such a phenomenon. The weakening of the rule of law in the organization paves the way for people who lack professional ability but are flattered. Many corruptions and destructions in the organization are caused by this unpleasant phenomenon. People who, without any commitment and expertise, have learned the illegal and inhumane ways of failing and failing to perform assigned duties, according to the experience and attention of some sick people, and they can make themselves respected by the heads of organizations. They place themselves as an efficient force in an organization and in some cases, they don't shy away from objections to taste, opinions and orders.
Keywords

Subjects


  1. جاسمی، مدینه، صمدی، نسرین، اسماعیلی ذبیحی، رقیه، و احمدزاده، جمال (1401). بررسی ارتباط بین قدرت سازمانی درک‏شده با میزان رضایت شغلی در پرستاران شاغل در مراکز آموزشی درمانی علوم پزشکی ارومیه.. پرستاری و مامایی، 20(9)، 733-740. https://unmf.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-4286-fa.html
  2. حسینیان راد، امیر، حسنوند، امین، و شیره‏پز آرانی، علی‏اصغر (1402). بررسی تأثیر قدرت بر مؤلفه‌های تفکر راهبردی در مدیریت شهری (نمونۀ موردی: شهر خرم‏آباد). مطالعات جغرافیایی مناطق کوهستانی، ۴(۱)، ۱-۲۴. org/10.52547/gsma.4.4.1
  3. فراهانی، طیبه، و رحمتی، امین (1402). تأثیر منابع قدرت بر عملکرد روابط خریدار - فروشنده با توجه به نقش میانجی نتایج عملکرد مناقشه. پژوهش‏های روانشناختی در مدیریت، 9(1)، 139-151. org/10.22034/jom.2023.703857
  4. قاسمی، زهرا، حسینقلی­زاده، رضوان، و نوغانی دخت بهمنی، محسن (1395). عوامل مؤثر بر توزیع قدرت در شبکۀ سازمانی با تأکید بر رویکرد تحلیل شبکه. پژوهش­های مدیریت منابع سازمانی، 8(1)، 156-133.http://ormr.modares.ac.ir/article-28- 22278-fa.html
  5. محبوب­خواه، فرهاد، و بیگ­زاده، یوسف (1397). روابط بین پایه­های قدرت با ویژگی­های شخصیتی کارآفرینی و تعهد سازمانی با نقش میانجی عدالت رویه­ای. آینده­پژوهی مدیریت، 30(117)، 149-135. https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/jmfr/Article/784965
  6. مرادی، خالد (1395). بررسی رابطۀ بین منابع قدرت فرهنگیان و جو سازمانی مدارس دولتی دوره­های تحصیلی شهرستان بانه از دیدگاه معلمان، پایان­نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهیدرجایی.http://www.Magiran.com/p1660574
  7. معینی­شهرکی، ‌هاجر، ترک­زاده، جعفر، محمدی، مهدی، و خادمی، محسن (1390). بررسی رابطۀ بین نوع ساختار سازمانی و منابع قدرت فرهنگیان در واحدهای ستادی دانشگاه شیراز. مطالعات بهبود و تحول، 66، 193-165. https://jmsd.atu.ac.ir/article_1891_21.html
  8. نوریائی، محمدحسین، و سرلک، محمدعلی (1398). بررسی رفتار مدیران در مواجهه با جریان‏های شکافندۀ سازمانی با تکیه بر منابع قدرت. فصلنامۀ علوم مدیریت ایران، 14(54)، 123-151. https://journal.iams.ir/article_311.html

References

  1. Anicich, E.M., & Hirsh, J.B. (2017). The psychology of middle power: Vertical code-switching, role conflict, and behavioral inhibition. Academy of Management Review, 42(4), 659-682. org/10.5465/amr.2016.0002
  2. Argon, T., & Dilekçi, Ü. (2016). Teacher Views on School Administrators' Organizational Power Sources and Their Change Management Behaviours. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(9), 2195-2208.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040932
  3. Barro, S., & Davenport, T.H. (2019). People and machines: Partners in innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(4), 22-28. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/people-machines-partners-innovation/docview/2273706424/se-2
  4. Creswell, J.W. (2013) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th Edition). SAGE Publications, Inc., London.
  5. De Vries, M.F.K. (2003). Leaders, fools, and impostors: Essays on the psychology of leadership. Jossey-Bass.
  6. De Vries, M.F.K. (2019). Down the rabbit hole of leadership: Leadership pathology in everyday life. Springer.
  7. DeCelles, K.A., DeRue, D.S., Margolis, J.D., & Ceranic, T.L. (2012). Does power corrupt or enable? When and why power facilitates self-interested behavior. Journal of applied psychology, 97(3), 681. org/10.1037/a0026811
  8. Ernst, J., & Koll, H. (2024). Managerial pedagogy and organizational power dynamics in the context of neoliberal organizational transition. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 40(3). org/10.1016/j.scaman.2024.101334
  9. Farahani, T., & Rahmati, A. (2023). The effect of power sources and performance outcomes of the efficient and inefficient conflict of interest in the buyer-seller. Psychological Researches in Management, 9(1), 139-151. doi.org/10.22034/jom.2023.703857 (In Persian)
  10. Finkelstein, S. (1992). Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management journal, 35(3), 505-538. org/10.5465/256485
  11. Ghasemi, Z., Hossein Qolizadeh, R., & Noghani Dokht Bahmani, M. (2018). Factors affecting the distribution of power in the organizational network with an emphasis on the network analysis approach. Organizational Resource Management Research, 8(1), 133-155. http://ormr.modares.ac.ir/article-28- 22278-fa.html (In Persian)
  12. Hoseinian Rad, A., Hasanvand, A., & Shirepaz Arani, A. (2023). Investigates the influence of power on the strategic thinking in urban management Case: Khorramabad city. Journal of Geographical Studies of Mountainous Areas, 4(13), 1-23. http://gsma.lu.ac.ir/article-1-370-fa.html (In Persian)
  13. Jasemi, M., Samadil, N., Esmaeili Zabihi, R., & Ahmadzadeh, J. (2022). The Relationship Between Perceived Organizational Power with Job Satisfaction in Nurses Working in Urmia Teaching Hospitals. Nursing and Midwifery Journal, 20(9), 733-740. http://unmf.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-4286-fa.html (In Persian)
  14. Katsos, J.E., & Fort, T.L. (2016). Leadership in the promotion of peace: Interviews with the 2015 Business for Peace honorees. Business Horizons, 59(5), 463-470. org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.03.010
  15. Krause, D.E., Kearney, E., & Street, W. (2006). The use of power bases in different contexts: Arguments for a context-specific perspective. In Power and influence in organizations: New empirical and theoretical perspectives (Research in Management). Hartford, pp. 59-86.
  16. Magee, J.C., & Smith, P.K. (2013). The social distance theory of power. Personality and social psychology review, 17(2), 158-186. org/10.1177/1088868312472732
  17. Mahbobkhah, F., & Beigzadeh, Y. (2019). Relations between power bases with entrepreneurial personality traits and organizational commitment Mediating role of procedural justice. Future study Management, 30(117), 135-148. https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/jmfr/Article/784965 (In Persian)
  18. Moeini Shahraki, H., Torkzadeh, J., Mohammadi, M., & Khademi, M. (2011). A Survey of Relationship Between Organizational Structure Types and Administrators' Power Resources at Shiraz University's Administration division. Management Studies in Development and Evolution, 21(66), 165-193. https://jmsd.atu.ac.ir/article_1891_21.html (In Persian)
  19. Mollick, E. (2012). People and process, suits and innovators: The role of individuals in firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1001-1015. doi.org/10.1002/smj.1958
  20. Moradi, K. (2011).Investigating the Relationship between the Sources of Cultural Power and the Organizational Climate of Public Schools in Baneh from the Perspective of Teachers [Tarbiat Dabir Shahid Rajaei University Thesis]. http://www.Magiran.com/p1660574 (In Persian)
  21. Nauman, S., Tariq, A., & Saleem, M. (2021). Effect of Workplace Bullying on Workplace Deviance and Project Success: Mediating Role of Perception of Politics. org/10.1108/PR-06-2020-0474
  22. Nooriaee, M., & Sarlak, M. (2019). Investigating managers' Professional behavior in organizational rip currents Relying on power resources. Iranian journal of management sciences, 14(54), 71-99. https://journal.iams.ir/article_311.html (In Persian)
  23. O'Reilly, C.A., & Pfeffer, J. (2021). Organizational power and politics: The narcissist's advantage?. Personality and Individual Differences, 182. org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111061
  24. Pike, B.E., & Galinsky, A.D. (2020). Power leads to action because it releases the psychological brakes on action. Current opinion in psychology, 33, 91-94. org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.028
  25. Rubel, M.R.B., Rimi, N.N., Yusliza, M.Y., & Kee, D.M.H. (2018). High commitment human resource management practices and employee service behaviour: Trust in management as mediator. IIMB Management Review, 30(4), 316-329. org/10.1016/j.iimb.2018.05.006
  26. Scott, J. (2019). Contemporary Capitalism and the Distribution of Power in Society (pp. 133–46). In The Oxford Handbook of Max Weber (E. Hanke, Scaff, & S. Whimster, Eds.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190679545.013.5
  27. See, K.E., Morrison, E.W., Rothman, N.B., & Soll, J.B. (2011). The detrimental effects of power on confidence, advice taking, and accuracy. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 116(2), 272-285. org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.006
  28. Shafritz, J.M., Ott, J.S., & Jang, Y.S. (2015). Classics of organization theory. Cengage Learning.
  29. Shapira, R. (2019a). ‘Jumper’managers’ vulnerable involvement/avoidance and trust/distrust spirals. Journal of Trust Research, 9(2), 226-246. org/10.1080/21515581.2019.1653767
  30. Shapira, R. (2019b). Leaders` Timely Succession: Neither Term Limits nor ‘Golden Parachutes’, Rather Periodic Tests of Trust Ascendance. Journal of Applied Social Science, 13(2), 180–96. doi.org/10.1177/1936724419876301
  31. Tawse, A., Patrick, V.M., & Vera, D. (2019). Crossing the chasm: Leadership nudges to help transition from strategy formulation to strategy implementation. Business Horizons, 62(2), 249-257. org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.09.005
  32. Thomas, B.J., & Harris, S. (2021). A new, established approach to managing misbehavior: system justification theory. Personnel Review, 50(7/8), 1582-1598. org/10.1108/PR-06-2020-0474
  33. Tost, L.P., Gino, F., & Larrick, R.P. (2012). Power, competitiveness, and advice taking: Why the powerful don’t listen. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1), 53-65. org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.10.001
  34. Ramos,, Pazmiño, P., Franco-Crespo, A., Ramos-Galarza, C., & Tejera, E. (2022). Comparative organizational network analysis considering formal power-based networks and organizational hierarchies. Heliyon, 8(1), 2405-8440. doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08661
  35. Vecchio, P. (2007). Power, Politics, and Influence (pp. 69–95). In Leadership: Understanding the Dynamics of Power and Influence in Organizations (R.P. Vecchio, Ed.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.