Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. student in Organizational Behavior Management, Faculty of Economics, Management and Administrative Sciences, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.

2 MSc in mechanics, Majoring in energy conversion, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Shahid Abbaspour University, Tehran, Iran.

3 MSc in Psychology, Majoring in clinical psychology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Purpose: Today, in a rapidly changing world, the ability to change regularly is very important to adapt to external challenges. However, changes in the basic characteristics of the organization may increase the probability of failure. For this reason, it seems that organizational transformation efforts cause resistance and it is one of the most important obstacles facing contemporary companies, especially in this regard. Organizational inertia is a term used to describe this aversion to change as well as the desire to maintain the status quo (Teofilus et al., 2022). Many behavioral researchers emphasize the importance of a "self-aware mind" whose benefits can be used to develop desirable behaviors (Bhardwaj & Pareek, 2023). Researchers and behavioral thinkers should pay a lot of attention to mindfulness; Because the wider use of this type of tactics offers great potential in various economic, social, etc. fields (Krickel, 2023). On the other hand, coaching as a rapidly growing and expanding profession is used to develop leadership and mental skills at all organizational levels. By using coaching skills, it becomes possible to teach mindfulness skills to all organizational levels. Moreover, by being fully involved in this process, outstanding leaders not only increase their leadership strategies but also reap useful values (Susanto, 2023). Therefore, to adopt an innovative business model in any organization, the inertia for change is a fundamental obstacle and its role has not been fully investigated (Moradi et al, 2021).
Methodology: Since the purpose of the research is to determine the relationships between the variables, the current research is of an applied type, and in terms of the method of data collection, it is descriptive, correlational, and single-section. The statistical sample of the research is 103 employees of the Kashan Electricity Distribution Company using the available sampling method. A 24-question questionnaire based on an ordinal scale and a five-point Likert scale was used to collect data. The questionnaire of this research consists of two parts: the first part includes demographic questions and the second part includes the main questions of the questionnaire that were raised based on the variables of the research and their validity and reliability were confirmed. The questionnaire includes three dimensions (coaching, mental-awareness, organizational inertia). The questions were reviewed by some professors. Also, to check the reliability and validity of the measurement model, Smart-PLS software was used due to its ability to test theories in the form of equations between variables. As can be seen, Cronbach's alpha coefficient for all research constructs is more than 0.7, which is at the desired level and shows the validity of the research measures.
Findings: The obtained results indicate that coaching has a negative and significant effect on organizational inertia in Kashan Electricity Distribution Company. Also, the positive and significant effect of coaching on the organizational mindfulness of employees of Kashan Electricity Distribution Company was confirmed. On the other hand, organizational mindfulness has a negative and significant effect on organizational inertia. Finally, the results of this research showed that organizational mindfulness plays a mediating role in the relationship between coaching and organizational inertia.
Discussion and Conclusion: Managers of electricity distribution companies are generally in a state of economic stagnation and feel that it is difficult to make fundamental changes. On the other hand, companies are looking for different coaching approaches to influence employees' behaviors and their training and learning, which may sometimes lead to employees' awareness and deeper understanding of their current situation and the organization. When the organization uses various resources such as time, manpower, money, communication, approvals, etc. in one direction, the change from the current direction is due to the unwillingness to waste the resources spent in the past and the patterns that have become a habit. As a result, managers can act by applying various coaching methods in line with deep awareness and alertness of the organization and increase the progress and evolution of the company. Managers of electricity distribution companies should note that at the beginning of the manager's entry into the system, it is possible to overcome organizational inertia much more than later. Over time, due to getting used to the existing situation and getting out of the shock of management change, the manager and employees tend to return to the previous situation and inertia prevents the organization from changing. On the other hand, for future research, it is suggested to investigate the relationship of this concept with other mentioned topics. Also, since the current research was conducted only in a limited industrial environment, it is suggested that this research be tested in other companies, industries, and cities as well.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. آذر، عادل، و خدیور، آمنه (1395). کاربرد تحلیل آماری چندمتغیره در مدیریت. تهران: انتشارات نگاه دانش.

References

  1. Alexander, D., & Bloom, G.A. (2023). Exploring coaches' experiences and perceptions of a virtual parasport coach mentorship program. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 64, 102303. doi: org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102303
  2. Azar, A., & Khadivar, A. (2015). Application of multivariate statistical analysis in management. Tehran: Negah Danesh Publications.
  3. Bhardwaj, R., & Pareek, A. (2023). The unconscious mind and planetary influences on the human unconscious mind and personality. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 11(1), 1617-1626. doi: 10.52215/1101/166
  4. Davy, B.J. (2021). A rationale for the study of unconscious motivations of climate change, and how ritual practices can promote pro-environmental behavior. Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology, 25(2), 113-129. org/10.1163/15685357-20211001
  5. Drayton, M. (2022). The saboteur at work: how the unconscious mind can sabotage ourselves, our organizations and society. Taylor & Francis.
  6. Fang, M. (2022). Leadership coaching to drive transformation in the experience economy. In: Crawford, J. (Ed.). Leadership - Advancing Great Leaders and Leadership. IntechOpen. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.108104
  7. Greiser, C., & Martini, J.P. (2018). Unleashing the power of mindfulness in corporations. The Boston Consulting Group (BCG), 15(2), 109-122.
  8. Hirschmann, G. (2021). International organizations' responses to member state contestation: from inertia to resilience. Aff. 97, 1963–1981. doi: 10.1093/ia/iiab169
  9. Hoppmann, J., Naegele, F., & Girod, B. (2019). Boards as a source of inertia: Examining the internal challenges and dynamics of boards of directors in times of environmental discontinuities. Academy of Management Journal, 62(2), 437-468. doi: 10.5465/amj.2016.1091
  10. Hulland, J., Ryan, M.J., & Rayner, R.K. (2009). Modeling customer satisfaction: A comparative performance evaluation of covariance structure analysis versus partial least squares. In Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications, 307-325.
  11. Ibarra, H., & Scoular, A. (2019). The leader as coach. Harvard Business Review, 97(6), 110-119. org/10.1177/097324700600200219
  12. Ihl, A., Strunk, K., & Fiedler, M. (2022). Interpretations of mindfulness practices in organizations: A multi-level analysis of interpretations on an organizational, group, and individual level. Organization, 29(6), 1099-1132. doi: 10.1177/1350508420968195
  13. Keng, S.L., Tong, E.M., Yan, E.T.L., Ebstein, R. P., & Lai, P. S. (2021). Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on affect dynamics: A randomized controlled trial. Mindfulness, 12, 1490-1501. doi: 10.1007/s12671-021-01617-5
  14. Kershaw, A., Glow, H., & Goodwin, K. (2022). Employment Practices and Institutional Inertia in the Arts Sector: The Roles and Skills of Arts Managers in Building Organizational Capacity and Creating Public Value. International Journal of Arts Management, 24(3), 21-45.
  15. Krickel, B. (2023). The unconscious mind worry: a mechanistic-explanatory strategy. Philosophy of Science, 90(1), 39-59. doi: 10.1017/psa.2022.18
  16. Moradi, E., Jafari, S. M., Doorbash, Z. M., & Mirzaei, A. (2021). Impact of organizational inertia on business model innovation, open innovation and corporate performance. Asia Pacific Management Review, 26(4), 171-179. doi: 10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.01.003
  17. Ndubisi, N. O., & Al‐Shuridah, O. (2019). Organizational mindfulness, mindful organizing, and environmental and resource sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(3), 436-446. doi: 10.1002/bse.2219
  18. Nyfoudi, M., Shipton, H., Theodorakopoulos, N., & Budhwar, P. (2022). Managerial coaching skill and team performance: How does the relationship work and under what conditions?. Human Resource Management Journal, 33, 328-345. doi: 10.1111/1748-8583.12443
  19. Petchsawang, P., & McLean, G. N. (2017). Workplace spirituality, mindfulness meditation, and work engagement. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 14(3), 216-244. doi: 10.1080/14766086.2017.1291360
  20. Petitta, L., & Martínez-Córcoles, M. (2022). A conceptual model of mindful organizing for effective safety and crisis management, The role of organizational culture. Current Psychology, 42: 25773- 25792, doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03702-x
  21. Reina, C. S., Kreiner, G. E., Rheinhardt, A., & Mihelcic, C. A. (2023). Your presence is requested: Mindfulness infusion in workplace interactions and relationships. Organization Science, 34(2), 722-753. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2022.1596
  22. Sillic, M. (2019). Critical impact of organizational and individual inertia in explaining non-compliant security behavior in the shadow IT context. Secur. 80, 108–119. doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2018.09.012
  23. Susanto, P. C. (2023). Coaching and mentoring education to improve the competence of final-semester students. In International Conference on Education of Suryakancana (IConnects Proceedings), 8(4), 229-234
  24. Teofilus, T., Ardyan, E., Sutrisno, T. F., Sabar, S., & Sutanto, V. (2022). Managing organizational inertia: indonesian family business perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1-12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.839266
  25. Zhen, J., Cao, C., Qiu, H., & Xie, Z. (2021). Impact of organizational inertia on organizational agility: the role of IT ambidexterity. Information Technology and Management, 22, 53-65. doi: 10.1007/s10799-021-00324-w