Psychological Research in Management

Psychological Research in Management

Presenting a Fuzzy Cognitive Map of the Causes of the Tendency and Consequences of Using the Chameleon Leadership style

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Professor, Department of Management, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran. Corresponding Author, Email: mrezasep@yahoo.com
2 Ph.D. Student in Public Management, Department of Management, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran. Email: zahra.eyni401@gmail.com
3 Ph.D. Student in Public Management, Department of Management, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran. Email: akram.hashemipourrr@gmail.com
4 Ph.D. Student in Public Management, Department of Management, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran. Email: abbaspour.0509@gmail.com
Abstract
Purpose: One leadership style that effectively adapts to today’s dynamic environment through flexible and adaptive behaviors is the chameleon leadership style. Chameleon leaders possess the ability to modify their behavior and adjust to new situations to achieve their objectives. By aligning their approach with situational demands, they can lead effectively in various contexts. These leaders are characterized by their capacity for rapid adjustment in response to changing circumstances. A chameleon leader may also influence others through manipulative behaviors and superficiality, affecting them in complex ways. This leadership style has a dual nature, meaning it can generate both positive and negative outcomes. Accordingly, the present study aims to identify the causes of the inclination toward, and the consequences of using, the chameleon leadership style in knowledge based organizations. 
Design/Methodology/Approach: This study is exploratory in purpose and utilizes both qualitative and quantitative methods, following an inductive–deductive philosophical approach. The statistical population included experts selected through purposive sampling and based on the principle of theoretical saturation. The data collection tool in the qualitative phase was a semi structured interview, whose validity and reliability were confirmed using content validity, theoretical validity, and intra coder and inter coder reliability methods. In the quantitative phase, data were collected using a questionnaire whose validity and reliability were verified through content validity and test–retest reliability. Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis, while quantitative data were analyzed through the fuzzy cognitive map method.
‌‌‌‌‌
Findings: The results indicate that ambiguous and unpredictable environmental conditions, high emotional intelligence in managers, and a desire for popularity among managers are among the most significant drivers of the inclination toward the chameleon (sun worshipper) leadership style. Additionally, expanding the organization’s competitive capacity, increasing its adaptive capability, and enhancing crisis management competency were identified as the most important consequences of this leadership style.
Discussion and Conclusion: Knowledge based organizations operate in highly dynamic and competitive environments. In such contexts, the chameleon leadership style owing to its high degree of flexibility enables leaders to respond rapidly to changes and adjust their strategies and approaches accordingly, thereby guiding the organization toward success. The findings of this study are presented in both qualitative and quantitative dimensions. The qualitative results reveal the causes of the inclination toward, and the consequences of adopting, the chameleon leadership style in knowledge based organizations. The identified causes include: managers’ possession of quantum thinking, ambiguous and unpredictable environmental conditions, the institutionalization of a dual capacity organizational culture, managers’ tendency toward emperor building (imperialism), pursuit of profit and self interest, steering the organization toward competitive intelligence, high emotional intelligence among managers, the desire to strengthen organizational resilience, managers’ tendency toward popularity seeking, and the dominance of a visionary personality trait in managers. The identified consequences include: enhanced organizational adaptive capacity, improved crisis management competency, prevention of monotony and stagnation, increased bargaining power in problem solving, the emergence of administrative opportunism, strengthened organizational flexibility, enhanced organizational agility, introduction of opportunities for growth and development, expansion of competitive capacity, and the creation of a climate of paranoia and skepticism toward the manager.
Keywords

Subjects


 
1.      نظرپوری، امیر هوشنگ، عسگری، زهرا، و کوه‌نشین، الهه (1403). شناسایی و تحلیل عوامل مؤثر و پیامدهای رهبری آفتاب‌پرست در سازمان‌های دولتی. مدیریت فرهنگ سازمانی، 22(4)، 327-344.  https://doi.org/10.22059/jomc.2024.378836.1008680
References
1.       Akdere, M., & Egan, T. (2020). Transformational leadership and human resource development: Linking employee learning, job satisfaction, and organizational performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 31(4), 393-421. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21404
2.       Alvesson, M., & Einola, K. (2019). Warning for excessive positivity: Authentic leadership and other traps in leadership studies. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(4), 383-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.04.001
3.       Bahrami, H., & Evans, S. (2014). Super-flexibility for knowledge enterprises: A toolkit fordynamic adaptation. Springer.
4.       Durrah, O., & Kahwaji, A. (2023). Chameleon leadership and Innovative behavior in the health sector: The mediation role of job security. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 35, 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-022-09414-5
5.       Feldstein, S. (2019). The global expansion of AI surveillance (Vol. 17). Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
6.       Fisher, G. (2020). Why every business professor should write practitioner-focused articles. Business Horizons, 63(4), 417-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.03.004   
7.       Gadolin, C. & Wikström, E. (2016). Organizing healthcare with multi-professional teams: Activity coordination as a logistical fow. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 20(4), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.v20i4.14917
8.       Gordon, L., & Cleland, J.A. (2021). Change is never easy: How management theories can help operationalise change in medical education. Medical Education, 55(1), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14297
9.       Kuzmanov, I. (2025). The leader and the chameleon: Psychology, hierarchy, and the interpretation of adaptive personas. Journal of Novel Research and Innovative Development, 3(5), 2984-8687. https://doi.org/10.56975/jnrid.v3i5.701310
10.   Linsky, M., & Heifetz, R.A. (2002). Leadership on the line: Staying alive through the dangers of leading. Harvard Business School Press.
11.   Lynch, D. (2009). The chameleon factor: The mental management of multiple roles and what it reveals about the organizatin of culture [Ph.D Dissertation]. Rutgers University. https://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T3TT4R64
12.   Massoudi, A. (2022). Reviving performance by adopting chameleon style of leadership. Journal of Management and Business Education, 5(1), 1-19.  https://doi.org/10.35564/jmbe.2022.0001
13.   Mohammad, H.H., Faeq, D.K., Ali, B.J., & Ismael, Z.N. (2023). The effect of chameleon leadership on employee grievances. UKH Journal of Social Sciences, 7(1), 28-42. https://doi.org/10.25079/ukhjss.v7n1y2023.pp28-42
14.   Nave, E., & Katz, H. (2025). The “consistent chameleon”: Values-driven leadership among the “consistent chameleon”: Values-driven leadership among social and business leaders doing social entrepreneurship. The Journal of Values-Based Leadership. https://doi.org/10.22543/1948-0733.1495
15.   Nazarpouri, A.H., Asgari, Z., & Kouhneshin, E. (1403). Identifying and analyzing the effective factors and consequences of paranoid leadership in government organizations. Scientific Journal of Organizational Culture Management, 22(4), 344-327. https://doi.org/10.22059/jomc.2024.378836.1008680 )In Persian)
16.   Paais, M., & Pattiruhu, J.R. (2020). Effect of motivation, leadership, and organizational culture on satisfaction and employee performance. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(8), 577-588. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no8.577
17.   Sadler-Smith, E., Robinson, G., Akstinaite, V., & Wray, T (2018). Hubristic leadership: Understanding the hazard and mitigating the risks. Organizational Dynamics, 48(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2018.05.007
18.   Selem, K.M., & Saghier, E.G. (2025). Chameleon leader behaviors in tourism and hospitality businesses. Organisational Behaviour and Design, 331-340. https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-031-80422-9_20
19.   Tourish, D. (2014). Leadership, more or less? a processual, communication perspective on the role of agency in leadership theory. Leadership, 10(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715013509030
20.   Tyskbo, D., & Styhre, A. (2023). Karma chameleon: Exploring the leadership complexities of middle managers in the public sector. International Public Management Journal, 26(4), 548-569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2022.2106330
21.   Udin, U. (2024). Leadership styles and sustainable performance. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(8), 2024171. https://10.31893/multirev.2024171
22.   Ulrich, D. (2019). Changing facets of leadership in East Asia: globalization, innovation and performance in Japan, South Korea and China. In C. Rowley & I. Oh (Eds.), Leadership in East Asia: Globalization, Innovation and Creativity in Japan, South Korea and China (pp. 1-2). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2018.1557425
23.   Williams, J. (2022). Chameleon leadership and traits to serve on a global scale. In J. Crawford (Ed.), Leadership-advancing great leaders and leadership. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.108325
24.   Williams, J.A., Roberts, C., & Bosselman, R. (2011). Youth sports and the emergence of chameleon leadership. Journal of Leadership Studies, 5(3), 6-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.20227
Yustantio, J. (2021). Unpacking the ‘bamboo ceiling’effect from an emotions perspective and examining potential solutions through mentors and role models [Doctoral dissertation]. University of New South Wales. https://doi.org/10.26190/unsworks/2272