After the authors submit the article, it undergoes an initial review within two weeks. The article is sent for peer review if it passes this initial stage. Reviewers are given a maximum of one month to complete their review. If a reviewer fails to review the article or withdraws, the article will be reassigned to another reviewer.
Upon receiving the reviewers' feedback:
If two reviewers reject the article, it will be archived.
If both reviewers request major revisions, the article will be returned to the author for revisions.
If one reviewer accepts and the other rejects the article, it will be sent to a third reviewer, and the final decision will be based on their review.
Once the author submits the revised version and it is approved by the reviewers, the article proceeds to final review by the editorial board. If approved, the article is prepared for publication.
A journal expert reviews the article within one week to check compliance with the submission guidelines.
Authors must carefully read the submission guidelines before submitting their articles to ensure compliance.
In the second stage, the editor reviews the article for content quality and topic relevance (within one week).
At this stage, the author may request initial revisions to improve the article’s quality before proceeding to the peer review stage.
The article is sent to two anonymous reviewers.
The reviewers' feedback results in one of three possible outcomes:
If both reviewers reject the article, it will be archived.
If both reviewers request major revisions, the article will be returned to the author for revision.
If one reviewer accepts and the other rejects, the article will be sent to a third reviewer, and the final decision will be based on their review.
Authors must revise the article based on the reviewers’ comments.
The revised article is sent back to the reviewers for comparative evaluation.
Reminder emails will be sent to reviewers every five days.
The article will be reassigned to a new reviewer if the review is not completed within 30 days.
Once the reviewers approve revisions, the article is sent to the editorial board for final review.
The editorial board may suggest minor changes or approve the article for publication.
If the article passes all stages, it is prepared for publication.
If the article is rejected at any stage, it is archived and cannot be resubmitted.
✅ The review process follows a Double-Blind Peer Review system.
✅ Reminder emails are sent to reviewers to expedite the review process.
✅ Rejected articles are archived and cannot be resubmitted.
✅ The editorial board makes the final decision on all articles.
✅ The estimated time for article acceptance is approximately three months, provided all stages are completed successfully.
This process ensures transparency, efficiency, and high-quality peer review in article evaluation.
